Thats great! Thanks. this will help us reduce network context switching as we remove the need to pass a lot of uncompressed packets.
-Jack On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > Regards compressing the HTTP transactions between the REST server and REST > client we punted on this back when Stargate had a WAR target so we could push > that off to the servlet container configuration. Thanks for the question, > which reminded me... I have just committed HBASE-3275, which is a trivial > patch to support Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate > > Index: src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/rest/Main.java > =================================================================== > --- src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/rest/Main.java (revision > 1038732) > +++ src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/rest/Main.java (working copy) > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ > import org.mortbay.jetty.Server; > import org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Context; > import org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder; > +import org.mortbay.servlet.GzipFilter; > > import com.sun.jersey.spi.container.servlet.ServletContainer; > > @@ -132,6 +133,7 @@ > // set up context > Context context = new Context(server, "/", Context.SESSIONS); > context.addServlet(sh, "/*"); > + context.addFilter(GzipFilter.class, "/*", 0); > > server.start(); > server.join(); > > Regards interactions between HBase client and server, there is no option > available for compressing Hadoop RPC. > > - Andy > > > --- On Wed, 11/24/10, Jack Levin <magn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> From: Jack Levin <magn...@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: question about meta data query intensity >> To: user@hbase.apache.org, apurt...@apache.org >> Date: Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 9:25 AM >> >> Yes, but that does not alleviate CPU contention should there be too >> many queries to a single region server. On a separate topic, is >> 'compression' in the works for REST gateway? Similar to >> mysql_client_compression? We plan to drop in 500K or >> more queries at a time into the REST, and it would be interesting >> to see the performance gain against uncompressed data. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -Jack > > > > >
