Bill, I believe using CDH3B*2* will get you what you want.
ASF HBase 0.90 will not be compatible with secure versions of Hadoop, which includes CDH3B3. Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) --- On Tue, 12/21/10, Bill Graham <billgra...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Bill Graham <billgra...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: provide a 0.20-append tarball? > To: user@hbase.apache.org, apurt...@apache.org > Cc: d...@hbase.apache.org > Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2010, 11:41 PM > Hi Andrew, > > Just to make sure I'm clear, are you saying that HBase 0.90.0 is > incompatible with CDH3b3 due to the security changes? > > We're just getting going with HBase and have been running 0.90.0rc1 on > an un-patched version of Hadoop in dev. We were planning on upgrading > to CDH3b3 to get the sync patches. > > thanks, > Bill > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > > The latest CDH3 beta includes security changes that > currently HBase 0.90 and trunk don't incorporate. Of course > we can help out with clear HBase issues, but for security > exceptions or similar, what about that? Do we draw a line? > Where? > > > > I've looked over the CDH3B3 installation documentation > but have not installed it nor do presently use it. > > > > If we draw a line, then as an ASF community we should > have a fallback option somewhere in ASF-land for the user to > try. Vanilla Hadoop is not sufficient for HBase. Therefore, > I propose we make a Hadoop 0.20-append tarball available. > > > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting > back. > > - Piet Hein (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > >