Want to paste your configuration up in pastebin? Is that 700million puts a day?
Remind us of your cluster size. Paste some of a regionserver log too. That can be informative. St.Ack On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Venkatesh <vramanatha...@aol.com> wrote: > shell is no problems..ones/twos..i've tried mass puts from shell > we cant handle our production load (even 1/3 of it) > 700 mill per day is full load..same load we handled with absolutely no issues > in 0.20.6.. > there is several pause between batch of puts as wel > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stack <st...@duboce.net> > To: user@hbase.apache.org > Sent: Wed, Apr 20, 2011 1:30 pm > Subject: Re: hbase 0.90.2 - incredibly slow response > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Venkatesh <vramanatha...@aol.com> wrote: > >> > >> I was hoping that too.. > >> I don't have scripts to generate # requests from shell..I will try that.. > >> > > > > Did you try it? > > > > Above you seem to say that a simple put of < 100 bytes takes 2 seconds > > where in 0.20.6 it took < 10 milliseconds. A put from shell of 100 > > bytes is easy enough to do. > > > > hbase> put 'YOUR_TABLE', 'SOME_ROW', 'SOME_COLUMN', 'SOME_STRING_OF_100_BYTES' > > > > The shell will print out rough numbers on how long it takes to do the > > put (from ruby). > > > > > >> I did n't pre-create regions in 0.20.6 & it handled fine the same load.. > >> I'll try performance in 0.90.2 by precreating regions.. > >> > >> Would sharing a single HBaseConfiguration object for all threads hurt > > performance? > >> > > > > I'd doubt that this is the issue. It should help usually. > > > > St.Ack > > > >
