Good catch! Thanks. On May 31, 2011, at 5:55 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> <thrift.version>0.5.0</thrift.version><!-- newer version available --> > > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Ward <m...@imageshack.net> wrote: > >> $ thrift -version >> Thrift version 0.6.0 >> >> Not sure about the Hbase Dependency. >> >> On May 31, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> >>> Which versions of thrift are involved here? This sounds like a Thrift >>> version mismatch. >>> >>> What does [thrift -version] say? What is the hbase dependency? >>> >>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Matthew Ward <m...@imageshack.net> >> wrote: >>> >>>> The issue I am encountering is that the code generated doing 'thrift >> --gen >>>> java Hbase.thrift' outputs code utilizing the 'ByteBuffer' type instead >> of >>>> 'bytes[]'. All the code in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.thrift utilizes >> byte[]. >>>> So basically the code generated via thrift is incompatible with the >> current >>>> implementation of org.apache.hadoop.hbase.thrfit.Hbase.java. I would >> either >>>> have to rewrite Hbase.java to use ByteBuffers (like the most latest code >> is >>>> doing) or Rewrite all the boiler plate code thrift generates to use >> byte[]. >>>> Bothe process seem to be a big pain, so I was seeing if there was >> something >>>> I didn't know in getting thrift to generate code that is compatible with >> how >>>> 90.3 is implemented. >>>> >>>> >>>> -Matt >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On May 31, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>> >>>>> This may help: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> http://download.oracle.com/javase/1,5.0/docs/api/java/nio/ByteBuffer.html#array() >>>>> >>>>> < >>>> >> http://download.oracle.com/javase/1,5.0/docs/api/java/nio/ByteBuffer.html#array() >>>>> What >>>>> is it you are actually trying to do? >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Matthew Ward <m...@imageshack.net> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I am trying to autogen some code off of 90.3. I made some custom >>>> additions >>>>>> to our thrift server, however the code that gets generated uses >>>> ByteBuffers >>>>>> as opposed to byte[]. How can I get around having to manually add to >> the >>>>>> autogen code to match? >>>>>> Is there a thrift flag or different server definition i should use? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Matt >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
