Thanks Ted, I thought the patch to trunk is OK to 0.90 branch. So we have to wait for the patch.
Another question, our observation is much like HBASE-3872, we lost the file on hdfs, and have a hole in the meta. But any other way to confirm this problem? For example, can we find some clues in the logs? On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > Please direct question related to cdh to cdh-dev > > Patch of HBASE-3872 for 0.90 branch isn't posted yet. Do you have a patch > already ? > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Xu-Feng Mao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Since we've run into HBASE-3872 issue, we're considering upgrade a > > production system from cdh3u0 to 0.90.3+HBASE-3872 patched. > > Is it safe to just replace the hbase directory, and restart all the > > regionservers and master? We have no chance to stop the whole cluster > > together, can we restarted the regionservers partly, ie., can cdh3u0 and > > 0.90.3 cooperate for a while? > > > > Thanks and regards > > > > Mao Xu-Feng > > >
