Hi Andy, Thanks for the pointer to the 0.20.205.0 release.
We are constrained to use Scientific Linux for our cluster and although SciLin is close to Red Hat from experience CDH does not just drop into place. We've got used to managing Hadoop/HBase for our cluster. So I'd like to avoid CDH3 for now. We will try building 1.0 for ourselves first. Plan B will be the 0.20.205 release you pointed out. Just to clarify: browsing the SVN repo it looks like hadoop/common/branches/branch-1.0 and hadoop/common/tags/release-1.0.0-rc2 are identical. Is that correct? Royston On 13 Dec 2011, at 19:11, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Royston, > > Hadoop 1.0 was/is also known as the 0.20.20x branch. It's confusing, I > apologize. > > The current release of that branch is 0.20.205: > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/releases.html#17+Oct%2C+2011%3A+release+0.20.205.0+available > . > > A "1.0" release from this lineage should be happening soon. The corresponding > branch in Apache SVN is "branch-1.0". > > Until a release happens, CDH3 is your best option for HBase. > > > Best regards, > > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via > Tom White) > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Royston Sellman <royston.sell...@googlemail.com> >> To: user@hbase.apache.org >> Cc: >> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 10:42 AM >> Subject: Re: hbase coprocessor availability issue in 0.90.4 >> >> Hi Andy, >> >> Thanks for your reply. I had not realised there is a Hadoop 1.0. Can you >> tell me >> if there is a release for it or do I have to build my own from the source? >> >> Royston >> >> >> On 13 Dec 2011, at 16:45, Andrew Purtell wrote: >> >>>> Does hbase-0.92.0-candidate-0 run with hadoop 0.20.2? >>> >>> This is not recommended or supported, due to lack of append support in HDFS >> in that release. Consider Hadoop 1.0 or CDH3. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> >>> - Andy >>> >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: Royston Sellman <royston.sell...@googlemail.com> >>>> To: user@hbase.apache.org >>>> Cc: >>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 8:02 AM >>>> Subject: Re: hbase coprocessor availability issue in 0.90.4 >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Does hbase-0.92.0-candidate-0 run with hadoop 0.20.2? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Royston >>>> >>>> >>>> On 13 Dec 2011, at 09:39, Harsh J wrote: >>>> >>>>> Akhtar, >>>>> >>>>> You may find them under >>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-0/ >>>>> >>>>> On 13-Dec-2011, at 3:04 PM, Akhtar Muhammad Din wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> From where I can download release candidate for 0.92, I can >> only find >>>>>> 0.90.4 version available as the latest release >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Andrew Purtell >>>> <apurt...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Arsalan, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For the Coprocessor feature, you will need to upgrade to >> the 0.92 >>>> release >>>>>>> or later. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Andy >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 13, 2011, at 12:04 AM, Arsalan Bilal >>>> <charsalanbi...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am currently using habse 0.90.4. >>>>>>>> I want to implement Coprocessors. I know that >> coprocessors were >>>> part of >>>>>>>> 0.92 and in hbase book, it is clearly mention that >> Coprocessors >>>> are >>>>>>>> currently on TRUNK. >>>>>>>> Is there any way to implement coprocessors in 0.90.4 or >> will it >>>> be >>>>>>>> available in next release? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>> Arsalan Bilal >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Akhtar Muhammad Din >>>>> >>>> >>
