> I do not know if this was fixed in 0.90.X but, its possible that there is a 
> bug with REST that causes full scan of META for any misses. 


It's possible but REST relies on HTable / HTablePool and tries to do the right 
thing with the client API, to minimize REST specific problems interacting with 
HBase, HBASE-5228 not withstanding, a mistake for which I apologize.


Best regards


       - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via 
Tom White)


----- Original Message -----
> From: Ben West <bwsithspaw...@yahoo.com>
> To: "user@hbase.apache.org" <user@hbase.apache.org>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:46 AM
> Subject: Re: Meta region hotspotting
> 
>T hanks Jack.
> 
> We couldn't find any "bad" queries (though perhaps we weren't 
> looking hard enough) but an upgrade to 0.92rc3 seems to have resolved the 
> problem. Not sure why, but there were a couple modifications to HTablePool 
> that 
> might've done it.
> 
> Thanks for your help everyone,
> -Ben
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jack Levin <magn...@gmail.com>
> To: user@hbase.apache.org
> Cc: Ben West <bwsithspaw...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 7:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Meta region hotspotting
> 
> Some time ago, we had a situation where our REST server was slammed
> with queries that did not find any matches for rows in Hbase.  When
> that happened we sustained 50k rpc/sec to META region server as
> reported by the master web page.  After digging deeper we found that
> reach request with 'wrong' url, caused full scan of META (more than
> 30k records for us),  This was in version 0.89.   I do not know if
> this was fixed in 0.90.X but, its possible that there is a bug with
> REST that causes full scan of META for any misses.   Just something to
> check.  (as soon as we removed the erroneous queries to REST this
> issue was resolved).
> 
> -Jack
> 
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>  On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Ben West <bwsithspaw...@yahoo.com> 
> wrote:
>>>  For those following at home, I tried this change and it does not appear 
> to have solved the problem. Back to the drawing board.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>>  Thanks for digging in Ben.
>>  St.Ack
>

Reply via email to