There is no secondary index support in HBase at the moment.

It's on our road map.

FYI

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Bing Li <[email protected]> wrote:

> Jacques,
>
> Yes. But I still have questions about that.
>
> In my system, when users search with a keyword arbitrarily, the query is
> forwarded to Solr. No any updating operations but appending new indexes
> exist in Solr managed data.
>
> When I need to retrieve data based on ranking values, HBase is used. And,
> the ranking values need to be updated all the time.
>
> Is that correct?
>
> My question is that the performance must be low if keeping consistency in a
> large scale distributed environment. How does HBase handle this issue?
>
> Thanks so much!
>
> Bing
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Jacques <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > It is highly unlikely that you could replace Solr with HBase.  They're
> > really apples and oranges.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Bing Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I wonder how data in HBase is indexed? Now Solr is used in my system
> >> because data is managed in inverted index. Such an index is suitable to
> >> retrieve unstructured and huge amount of data. How does HBase deal with
> >> the
> >> issue? May I replaced Solr with HBase?
> >>
> >> Thanks so much!
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Bing
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to