On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Bryan Beaudreault <bbeaudrea...@hubspot.com> wrote: > I imagine it isn't a great idea to create a ton of scans > (1 for each row), which is the only way I can think to do the above with > what we have. >
You want to step through some set of rows in lock-step? That is, get first N on row A, then first N on row B, etc., then when that is done, go back and step through next N on A, B, and so on? (Pardon me if I'm being a bit thick -- its early here) I know of no way to do this other than as you suggest -- a scanner per row (not too bad given your rows are wide) or what about a scan to do first N, then a new scan to do next N... would that work? St.Ack
