Thanks for the tip Doug. Does that boost come largely from the HDFS improvements?
On 5/2/12 7:52 PM, "Doug Meil" <doug.m...@explorysmedical.com> wrote: > >re: "with lackluster performance for random reads" > >You want to be on CDH3u3 for sure if you want to boost random read >performance. > > > > >On 5/2/12 5:29 PM, "Paul Mackles" <pmack...@adobe.com> wrote: > >>I think the answer to this is "no", but I am hoping someone with more >>experience can confirm thisŠ we are on hbase 0.90.4 (from cdh3u2). Some >>of our storefiles have grown into the 3-4GB range (we have 100GB max >>region size). Ignoring compactions, do large storefiles like this have a >>negative impact on random reads? We only recently started doing a large >>number of random gets so I have no history to go on in terms of >>correlating storefile size with lackluster performance for random reads. >> >>Thanks, >>Paul > >
