Hi, On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Adrien Mogenet <[email protected]> wrote: > "Don't bother trying this in production" ;-) > > 1. Are you sure lookup by key are faster ?
No clue. But I also didn't say it's faster, just fast. :) > 2. Updating Lucene files in a lock-free maneer and ensuring good > concurrency can be a bit tricky AFAIK Lucene files are immutable. Updates are delete and add. Deletes are flags like tombstone markers in HBase. > 3. AFAIK, Lucene files don't fit in HDFS and thus another distributed > storage is required. Katta does not look as powerful as Hadoop. Katta and Hadoop are two different tools, though. From what I recall, Katta simply used HDFS for storing indices, but would push them elsewhere for searching purposes. Otis -- Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Otis Gospodnetic > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Has anyone attempted using Lucene instead of HFiles (see >> https://twitter.com/otisg/status/254047978174701568 )? >> >> Is that a completely crazy, bad, would-never-work, >> don't-bother-trying-this-at-home, it's-too-late-go-to-sleep idea? Or >> not? >> >> Thanks, >> Otis >> -- >> Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html >> Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html > > > > -- > Adrien Mogenet > 06.59.16.64.22 > http://www.mogenet.me
