Shouldn't you be able to insert delete with t belonging to (t2, t3) to achieve this effect?
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Jonathan Natkins <na...@wibidata.com>wrote: > Yep, that's the scenario I was curious about. Thanks! > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > Is that what you mean? > > > > In the same CF:C > > insert r1 v1 t1 > > insert r1 v2 t2 > > insert r1 v3 t3 > > > > Then you want to be able to delete r1 v3 t3 to see r1 v2? > > > > This is not possible. If you put a delete with t4, everything older > > than t4 will be deleted when the compression will occur. > > > > JM > > > > 2013/3/7 Jonathan Natkins <na...@wibidata.com>: > > > It was suggested to me that there might be a way to delete a cell in a > > > column for a particular timestamp, without masking all older values. Is > > > this true? Or have I been fed lies? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Natty > > > > > > -- > > > http://www.wibidata.com > > > office: 1.415.496.9424 x208 > > > cell: 1.609.577.1600 > > > twitter: @nattyice <http://www.twitter.com/nattyice> > > > > > > -- > http://www.wibidata.com > office: 1.415.496.9424 x208 > cell: 1.609.577.1600 > twitter: @nattyice <http://www.twitter.com/nattyice> >
