As others mention HBASE-6870 is about coprocessorExec() always scanning the
full .META. table to determine region locations.  Is this what you mean or
are you talking about your coprocessor always scanning your full user table?

If you want to limit the scan within regions in your user table, you'll
need to pass startRow and endRow as parameters to your instance.GetList()
method.  Then when you create the region scanner in your coprocessor code,
you'll need to set the start and end row yourself in order to limit the
rows scanned.


On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please upgrade to 0.94.6.1 which is more stable.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Apr 19, 2013, at 4:58 AM, GuoWei <wei....@wbkit.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > We use base 0.94.1 in our production environment.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards / 商祺
> > 郭伟 Guo Wei
> >
> > 在 2013-4-19,下午6:01,Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> 写道:
> >
> >> Which hbase version are you using ?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> On Apr 19, 2013, at 2:49 AM, GuoWei <wei....@wbkit.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> We use HBase core processor endpoint  to process realtime data. But
> when I use coreprocessorExec method to scan table and pass startRow and
> endRow. It always scan all table instead of the result between the startRow
> and endRow.
> >>>
> >>> my code.
> >>>
> >>> results = table.coprocessorExec(IEndPoint_SA.class,  startrow, endrow,
> >>>          new Batch.Call<IEndPoint_SA,Hashtable<String,Hashtable>>() {
> >>>            public Hashtable<String,Hashtable> call(IEndPoint_SA
> instance)throws IOException{
> >>>                Hashtable<String,Hashtable> s = null;
> >>>              try {
> >>>                  s=instance.GetList();
> >>>              } catch (ParseException e) {
> >>>                  // TODO Auto-generated catch block
> >>>                  e.printStackTrace();
> >>>              }
> >>>              return s;
> >>>            }
> >>>          });
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards / 商祺
> >>> 郭伟 Guo Wei
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to