Which version of HBase?
Did you enable scanner caching? Otherwise each call to next() is a RPC 
roundtrip and you are basically measuring your networks RTT.

-- Lars


________________________________
 From: Vimal Jain <vkj...@gmail.com>
To: user@hbase.apache.org 
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 4:11 AM
Subject: Re: How many column families in one table ?
 

Can someone please reply ?
Also what isĀ  the typical read/write speed of hbase and how much deviation
would be there in my scenario mentioned above (14 cf , total 140 columns ) ?
I am asking this because i am not simply printing out the scanned values ,
instead i am applying some logic on the data retrieved per row basis. So
was just curious to find if that small logic in my code is contributing
towards the long time taken to scan the table.


On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Vimal Jain <vkj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I scanned it during normal traffic hours.There was no I/O load on the
> server.
> I dont see any GC locks too.
> Also i have given 1.5G to RS , 512M to each Master and Zookeeper.
>
> One correction in the post above :
> Actual time to scan whole table is even more , it takes 10 mins to scan
> 0.1 million rows ( so total of 2.5 hours to scan 1.6 million rows) .
> The time i mentioned in previous post was for different type of
> lookup.Please ignore that.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Viral Bajaria <viral.baja...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> When you did the scan, did you check what the bottleneck was ? Was it I/O
>> ?
>> Did you see any GC locks ? How much RAM are you giving to your RS ?
>>
>> -Viral
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Vimal Jain <vkj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > To completely scan the table for all 140 columnsĀ  , it takes around
>> 30-40
>> > minutes.
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> Vimal Jain
>



-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Vimal Jain

Reply via email to