Hi Jignesh,

I'm running 0.96.1.1 on Hadoop 2.2.0. So far I have not seen anything
wrong. But it's not yet a production cluster.

JM


2013/12/20 Jay Vyas <jayunit...@gmail.com>

> ... I assume you mean the latest hdfs versions... Since hbase 96 doesn't
> run on YARN container nodes yet. (See Hoya project which aims to port it
> over).
>
> While were on the subject... @steve which version of hbase is expected to
> contain the Hoya stuff?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Dec 20, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Jignesh Patel <jigneshmpa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Just curious !!! has anybody started using hbase-0.96.1.1 with hadoop
> 2.x?
> > How stable it is?
> >
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Should we now go remove the 0.96.1 release from mirrors ?
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The HBase Team is pleased to announce the immediate release of  HBase
> >>> 0.96.1.1.
> >>>
> >>> You should be able to download it from you favorite apache mirrors[1].
> >> It
> >>> has also been pushed to apache's maven repository.
> >>>
> >>> Note that hbase-0.96.1.1 comes in two flavors; a build that includes
> and
> >>> runs on hadoop-1.x and another for hadoop-2.x. You must chose the hbase
> >>> that suits your hadoop context.
> >>>
> >>> Upgrades from 0.92.x/0.94.x can requires shutdown and then an upgrade
> >>> procedure [2].  Upgrades from 0.96.x can be done via rolling upgrade
> >>> without downtime.
> >>>
> >>> This was a quick fix release with only 1 bug fix [3] that addressed an
> >> api
> >>> compatibility problem introduced between 0.96.0 ad 0.96.1.  We will be
> >>> removing 0.96.1.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> Your HBase Team
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/
> >>> [2] http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade0.96
> >>> [3] http://goo.gl/q4S94X
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> >>> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >>> // j...@cloudera.com
> >>
>

Reply via email to