On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:35 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> Raw scanning is about 30% slower than 0.94 in pure scan performance. My initial reaction to that is -0, but I don't think it holds up .0, just charts out work needed for .1. When developing on trunk we looked at the deltas between trunk and trunk+changes, not between releases. How different is this from 0.96 I wonder. -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
