Hi Julian,

I don't have an answer to your question, but I want to better understand your 
question: You are looking for data on the largest HBase deployments in 
practice, correct?

Regards,

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Wissmann [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 7:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Current Deployment Sizes

Hi,

thank you! The meetup link comes in handy. However this is not the answer to 
the question I asked (or maybe I wasn't clear enough).

I am well aware of the sizing notes etc. However what I am looking for are some 
hard numbers considering actual scale in the rela world. I can write a lot 
about how far in theory hbase could scale, however I'd like to have some hard 
numbers as to how far big deployments push this, today. For example the number 
of nodes Facebook or Yahoo are running and what amount of data they are 
crunching on those. This is where I have trouble finding current information!

Regards
Julian

2014-11-21 16:20 GMT+01:00 Ted Yu <[email protected]>:

> Have you looked at http://www.meetup.com/hbaseusergroup/files/ ?
>
> I think the following talks are relevant to your thesis:
> HBase-at-twitter 
> <http://files.meetup.com/1350427/HBase-at-twitter.pdf>
> HBase Sizing Notes
> <http://files.meetup.com/1350427/HBase%20Sizing%20Notes.pdf>
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Julian Wissmann 
> <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm currently writing my thesis, in part it is about HBase. I was
> wondering
> > if there are some current numbers for large deployments, i.e 
> > Facebook or Yahoo. I'm particularly interested in things like number 
> > of nodes, amount of data managed and (if available) query throughput.
> >
> >
> > The most recent information I was able to find is from 2012. If 
> > anyone
> has
> > some more recent numbers, or knows where to find them, I'd be happy 
> > for some hints in the right direction (or a let me google that for 
> > you link,
> if
> > in fact I was just too stupid to search the right thing ;-) ).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Julian
> >
>

Reply via email to