On Wed, May 27, 2015, at 11:41 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> Scanning without the column filter produces data?
>
> The content table on the new cluster has the same column family names
> ('x',
> in your example above)?
>
Yes, if I scan without a column filter (and I should probably try some
other filters at some point), the data is returned correctly.
I dumped the table schema from 0.92 using the shell 'describe' command.
I had to modify the 0.92 schema since it uses deprecated syntax before
recreating it in 0.98.
0.92 output of 'describe':
{NAME => 'content', FAMILIES => [{NAME => 'x', BLOOMFILTER => 'NONE',
REPLICATION_SCOPE => '0', VERSIONS => '3', COMPRESSION => 'NONE',
MIN_VERSIONS => '0', TTL => '2147483647', BLOCKSIZE => '65536',
IN_MEMORY => 'false', BLOCKCACHE => 'true'}]}
I modified this for import into 0.98:
create 'content', {NAME => 'x', BLOOMFILTER => 'NONE', REPLICATION_SCOPE
=> '0', VERSIONS => '3', COMPRESSION => 'NONE', MIN_VERSIONS => '0', TTL
=> '2147483647', BLOCKSIZE => '65536', IN_MEMORY => 'false', BLOCKCACHE
=> 'true'}
Did I get the table schema wrong in 0.98?
Z
