For the 96 region table, region size is too small. In production, I have seen region size as high as 50GB.
FYI > On Sep 7, 2015, at 2:55 AM, Akmal Abbasov <akmal.abba...@icloud.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I would like to know about pros and cons against small region sizes. > Currently I have cluster with 5 nodes, which serve 5 tables, but there are > ~80 regions per node, while actual data(total size of all hstores) is ~50GB. > Isn’t it an overhead, since there is a table which is ~30MB which has 96 > regions. > I was thinking about merging regions, because of overhead for managing > them(metadata, memstore per region, more flushes, more compactions). > Any suggestions? What is the avg region size in your case? > > Thanks. > >
