Hi,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:30 PM, anil gupta <anilgupt...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you know exact rowkey of row that you need to fetch then you just need > to use GET. If you know just the prefix of rowkey, then you can use range > scans in HBase. Does the above 2 scenario's cover your use case? > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Rajeshkumar J < > rajeshkumarit8...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Anil, > > > > I have about 10 million rows with each rows having more than 10k > > columns. I need to query this table based on row key and which will be > the > > apt query process for this > > > > Thanks > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:43 PM, anil gupta <anilgupt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Hi RajeshKumar, > > > > > > IMO, type of scan is not decided on the basis of response time. Its > > decided > > > on the basis of your query logic and data model. > > > Also, Response time cannot be directly correlated to any filter or > scan. > > > Response time is more about how much data needs to read, cpu, network > IO, > > > etc to suffice requirement of your query. > > > So, you will need to look at your data model and pick the best query. > > > > > > HTH, > > > Anil > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Rajeshkumar J < > > > rajeshkumarit8...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > My hbase table holds 10 million rows and I need to query it and I > > want > > > > hbase to return the query within one or two seconds. Help me to > choose > > > > which type of scan do I have to use for this - range scan or > rowfilter > > > scan > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Anil Gupta > > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Anil Gupta >
