We have some customers using it in prod. They are happy with it. Yeah interested in knowing what issues you faced reverting back. ________________________________________ From: Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 4:01 PM To: user@hbase.apache.org Subject: Re: Stripe Compactions - recommended/stable in 0.98?
What issues did you see reverting back? I don't have enough experience with the stripe compactions to call them stable yet. Maybe someone else does? On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:36 PM, sudhir patil <spatil.sud...@gmail.com> wrote: > It would be great if some one can reply about stability of stripe > compactions. > > Our performance tests with stripe compactions show much better results > compared to default compaction, but what worries me is this feature is > still marked as experimental in hbase book, also i have seen issues while > reverting back table with stripe compactions to default compaction. > > Is stripe compactions stable enough to use in production? helpful to have > your views. > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Otis Gospodnetić < > otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Stripe Compactions were introduced in 0.98 but not enabled by default. > > Are there any concerns or known issues with Stripe Compactions in 0.98? > > > > I looked for some info before asking, but it's surprising how rarely > Stripe > > Compactions are brought up: > > > > > http://search-hadoop.com/?q=stripe+compaction&fc_project=HBase&fc_type=mail+_hash_+user > > Maybe nobody really uses them? > > > > Thanks, > > Otis > > -- > > Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection > > Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/ > > >
