Interesting. Minor correction:
bq. The locations of all files and regions are kept in a special metadata table “*hbase:meta*” The locations of hfiles are not tracked in hbase:meta On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Chernov, Arseny <arseny.cher...@emc.com> wrote: > Dear colleagues at User@HBase , > > I really value your time and thank you for attention. I understand that, > without context setting, my mail carries a substantial risk to trigger a > huge off-top. This is not my intention at all. > > So, brief context is: we at EMC Isilon see strong uptake of HBase in > mid-market and enterprise datacenters, where sustained practices of ITIL, > compliance, legacy architectures and cost control , -- oftentimes are not > correlating well with true “Big Table” web-scale concepts of this brilliant > database. We see emergence of small, order of 100-s of TB-s, virtualised > HBase deployments, in different pockets of enterprise, as well. > > I humbly ask you to review and share your feedback (1x1 or in this forum) > your PoV-s on “Why HBase on Isilon” blogpost that I’ve just published: > > Why HBase on EMC Isilon – Top 5 Reasons http://bit.ly/2bSmKgc > > I’m very keen to learn more from this respected community, as well as > possibly answer your questions about EMC Isilon and share (to extent of > what could be shared) what we see. > > -- > Arseny Chernov > 陈毅誠 > > >
