Sorry that should read Hive not Spark here

Say compared to Spark that is basically a SQL layer relying on different
engines (mr, Tez, Spark) to execute the code

Dr Mich Talebzadeh



LinkedIn * 
https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw
<https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw>*



http://talebzadehmich.wordpress.com


*Disclaimer:* Use it at your own risk. Any and all responsibility for any
loss, damage or destruction of data or any other property which may arise
from relying on this email's technical content is explicitly disclaimed.
The author will in no case be liable for any monetary damages arising from
such loss, damage or destruction.



On 21 October 2016 at 13:17, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Mich:
> Here is brief description of hbase architecture:
> https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#arch.overview
>
> You can also get more details from Lars George's or Nick Dimiduk's books.
>
> HBase doesn't support SQL directly. There is no cost based optimization.
>
> Cheers
>
> > On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:43 AM, Mich Talebzadeh <mich.talebza...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a general question.
> >
> > Is Hbase fast because Hbase uses Hash tables and provides random access,
> > and it stores the data in indexed HDFS files for faster lookups.
> >
> > Say compared to Spark that is basically a SQL layer relying on different
> > engines (mr, Tez, Spark) to execute the code (although it has Cost Base
> > Optimizer), how Hbase fares, beyond relying on these engines
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Dr Mich Talebzadeh
> >
> >
> >
> > LinkedIn * https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=
> AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCd
> OABUrV8Pw>*
> >
> >
> >
> > http://talebzadehmich.wordpress.com
> >
> >
> > *Disclaimer:* Use it at your own risk. Any and all responsibility for any
> > loss, damage or destruction of data or any other property which may arise
> > from relying on this email's technical content is explicitly disclaimed.
> > The author will in no case be liable for any monetary damages arising
> from
> > such loss, damage or destruction.
>

Reply via email to