Yes. I am using batch variant. I will try your variant 02.03.2017 7:53 AM "Jingcheng Du" <dujin...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
What APIs are you using to execute the coprocessor? HTable#batchCoprocessorService? It executes the coprocessors regions by regions in each region server. How about using coprocessorService? This API should run coprocessors in parallel for different regions. 2017-03-02 14:32 GMT+08:00 Daniel Połaczański <dpolaczan...@gmail.com>: > I invoke my business logic which is similar to map reduce paradigm. > Everything works. Only performance is problem that regions are not > processed parallely. > I'm thinking about some hack like invoking 4 times rpc from client when i > have 4 regions > > 02.03.2017 00:43 "Ted Yu" <yuzhih...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > > To my knowledge, there is no support for this type of combination of map > > reduce and coprocessor. > > > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Daniel Połaczański < > dpolaczan...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > It is something like map reduce processing. > > > I want to run map and combine phase inside in a coprocessor for every > > > region separately, return partial results to the client. On the client > > > invoke reduce phase and store result in another hbase table. > > > > > > 2017-03-01 23:26 GMT+01:00 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > Can you describe your use case in more detail ? > > > > > > > > What type of custom coprocessor are you loading to the region server > ? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Daniel Połaczański < > > > dpolaczan...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > Let's assume that we have cluster consisting from one RegionServer > > and > > > > the > > > > > RegionsServer contains one table consisting from 3 regions. > > > > > > > > > > I would like to process regions in coprocessor parallely. Is it > > > > possible? > > > > > > > > > > I observed that currenlty it invokes coproprocessor with all the > > > regions > > > > > one by one. So it process at the beginig region1, when finished > > process > > > > > regions2 and ... > > > > > > > > > > Is it possible to change this behaviour? > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >