Master slave architecture is fine but why you want to take the snapshot on slave cluster. Your replication should covers disaster recovery scenario.
Regards, CM +1 201 763 1656 -----Original Message----- From: dkazhdan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 12:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: hbase backups Hi. I am trying to figure out our disaster recovery strategy and could certainly use some help. we have 2 hbase clusters with data replicated across in master/slave mode. My question is if there are any drawbacks in a model where we take snapshots on the slave cluster (the replication target) instead of taking them on the master cluster? would having live replication + snapshots on the slave cluster cover all disaster recovery scenarios? thank you for your help regards -- Sent from: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__apache-2Dhbase.679495.n3.nabble.com_HBase-2DUser-2Df4020416.html&d=DwICAg&c=j-EkbjBYwkAB4f8ZbVn1Fw&r=_LbUM-zocIAZ2IaTRY8Qi3cPxGOZ63yD_eWhd5YhdP0&m=OQolFgpNKHTu2JcE-n0GoQerbWfLTMDRa6ufgi74h_k&s=sGapfZNmqGv6gaXocGK_e82i1orrxygh0CDZvWG_n68&e=
