Filed HBASE-25771 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25771> to
recommend Hadoop 3.x
Feel free to chime in.

On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 7:00 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <[email protected]> wrote:

> i think it's time to remove that statement. We have lots of production
> users running HBase 2 on Hadoop 3 for several years now.
>
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 6:32 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> According to the compatibility matrix, HBase 2.3.4 could work together
>> with
>> Hadoop 3.2.2.
>>
>> And if you just want to connec to HDFS 3.2.2, you could just use the pre
>> built artifacts for HBase 2.3.4. If you want to use Hadoop 3.2.2 client in
>> HBase, you need to build the artifacts by your own.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> hossein ahmadzadeh <[email protected]> 于2021年3月31日周三 上午3:30写道:
>>
>> > <https://stackoverflow.com/posts/66877227/timeline>
>> >
>> > The HBase documentation <http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop>
>> noted
>> > that:
>> >
>> > Hadoop 2.x is faster and includes features, such as short-circuit reads
>> > (See Leveraging local data), which will help improve your HBase random
>> read
>> > profile. Hadoop 2.x also includes important bug fixes that will improve
>> > your overall HBase experience. HBase does not support running with
>> earlier
>> > versions of Hadoop. See the table below for requirements specific to
>> > different HBase versions. *Hadoop 3.x is still in early access releases
>> and
>> > has not yet been sufficiently tested by the HBase community for
>> production
>> > use cases.*
>> >
>> > But right next to this point in the compatibility table says that HBase
>> > 2.3.4 is fully functional with Hadoop 3.2.2. So I got confused about
>> > whether We can use HBase 2.3.4 in production alongside Hadoop 3.2.2 or
>> not?
>> >
>> > ‌Best Regards.
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to