Let's wait several more days. If no objections, I will start with the plan.

Thanks.

Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> 于2022年1月10日周一 08:16写道:

> That sounds like a pretty good plan to me. What do others think?
>
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 4:04 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > That's also a possible solution, I mean remove purge the docs in branches
> > other than master.
> >
> > So what should be done will be:
> > 1. Remove all docs from branches other than master.
> > 2. See how to skip the doc generating when docs are not there so we do
> not
> > break the publishing release process.
> > 3. Modify the documentation to also include the information about EOL
> > releases, instead of just purging them from the documentation.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> 于2022年1月10日周一 01:28写道:
> >
> > > Our branch-1 release process included a step to check out master and
> > > overwrite root src/ to do just that, manually synchronize docs for all
> > > releases.
> > >
> > > I do not believe we can keep docs in branches effectively synchronized.
> > > Periodic manual sweeps could work but is still error prone. It would be
> > > better to remove docs from all branches other than master and then
> there
> > > will be one copy only to maintain … that will be feasible.
> > >
> > > > On Jan 9, 2022, at 4:39 AM, 张铎 <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ouch. IIRC there are lots of documentation improvements only get
> > > > merged to master branch only...
> > > >
> > > > I think the fact for now is that, it is a bit hard for us to keep the
> > > > documentation for each minor release in sync correctly...
> > > > Since we will publish the ref guide as part of our releases, let's
> > > > just introduce a simple rule, keep the ref guide for all active
> > > > branches always the same, and once a release line gets EOL, we will
> > > > not update its ref guide any more.
> > > > At least for me this rule is not very hard to follow...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> 于2022年1月9日周日 17:15写道:
> > > >>
> > > >> We already publish version specific reference guides as a part of
> our
> > > >> binary tarballs. My understanding is that's a big part of why
> they're
> > > >> still in the main source repository; that we get docs built as a
> part
> > > >> of our assembly.
> > > >>
> > > >> e.g. just picking a 2.4 release I have handy:
> > > >>
> > > >> (base) sbusbey@seans-mbp ~ % tar tzf
> > Downloads/hbase-2.4.8-bin.tar.gz|
> > > >> grep pdf
> > > >> hbase-2.4.8/docs/apache_hbase_reference_guide.pdf
> > > >> (base) sbusbey@seans-mbp ~ % tar tzf
> > Downloads/hbase-2.4.8-bin.tar.gz|
> > > >> grep book.html
> > > >> hbase-2.4.8/docs/book.html
> > > >>
> > > >> Historically these do get maintained for each minor version. My
> > > >> understanding is that the diligence on backporting across both
> > > >> contributors to docs and release managers has varied considerably
> over
> > > >> time.
> > > >>
> > > >> If we're only going to have one version of the docs, then we should
> > > >> break the docs out of the main repo entirely so that we can simplify
> > > >> their generation.
> > > >>
> > > >> IIRC we have only gone through the trouble of publishing to the
> > > >> website version specific API docs / ref guides for release lines
> that
> > > >> made it to be the "stable" branch.
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 9:37 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> palomino...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I agree with Andrew that maybe it is beyond our ability to maintain
> > > >>> ref guides for different release lines and keep them all in sync...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> What about this, we just make the ref guide for the master branch
> in
> > > >>> sync, which contains all release lines. We will still remove
> > > >>> information of the EOL releases as needed, to keep the ref guide
> > > >>> clean, but as said in the title, less aggressive.
> > > >>> And when we decide to EOL a release line, we copy the ref guide of
> > the
> > > >>> current master branch to the specific branch, and generate the ref
> > > >>> guide for that release line for the last time.
> > > >>> In this way the release manager does not need to always think of
> > > >>> keeping the ref guide in sync, we all just need to consider the
> > master
> > > >>> one, only one extra work needs to be done when EOLing a release
> line.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> WDYT?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> 于2022年1月8日周六 07:16写道:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> There are some challenges with respect to keeping multiple
> versions
> > > of the
> > > >>>> documentation around. Each minor release needs a new version? Each
> > RM
> > > >>>> managing one or more code line(s) needs to update trunk docs and
> > also
> > > >>>> backport to branch docs (or not, depending)? There's been a JIRA
> > open
> > > >>>> forever for a 2.4 version of the book and honestly I haven't found
> > > time to
> > > >>>> do it, because it seems both low priority and nontrivial, and
> > there's
> > > never
> > > >>>> enough time for everything... although that may be a personal
> > failing.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:05 AM Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> We should have a version specific version of the ref guide that
> > > >>>>> contains that information.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> e.g.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> https://hbase.apache.org/1.4/book.html#hadoop
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> https://hbase.apache.org/2.3/book.html#hadoop
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Can we do a better job of making these discoverable to folks
> rather
> > > >>>>> than keeping stuff around?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 1:14 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> > palomino...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Recently we've seen several emails on the user list asking
> whether
> > > >>>>>> some hbase versions support specific hadoop versions, usually it
> > > will
> > > >>>>>> be some versions which are already EOL, so there is no
> information
> > > in
> > > >>>>>> our ref guide.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> For me I think we could leave the EOL versions in the support
> > matrix
> > > >>>>>> for a bit longer. It will be useful for our users.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Best regards,
> > > >>>> Andrew
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> > truth's
> > > >>>> decrepit hands
> > > >>>>   - A23, Crosstalk
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>
> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> decrepit hands
>    - A23, Crosstalk
>

Reply via email to