How about link to http://imageshack.us/ or TinyPic ?

Thanks

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can someone re-attach the missing figures for that wiki ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 7:15 AM, bharath vissapragada
> > <bharathvissapragada1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Igor,
> >>
> >> See http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hive/JoinOptimization and see the
> >> jira 1642 which automatically converts a normal join into map-join
> >> (Otherwise you can specify the mapjoin hints in the query itself.).
> >> Because your 'S' table is very small , it can be replicated across all
> >> the mappers and the reduce phase can be avoided. This can greatly
> >> reduce the runtime .. (See the results section in the page for
> >> details.).
> >>
> >> Hope this helps.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Jov <zhao6...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > 2011/3/20 Igor Tatarinov <i...@decide.com>:
> >> >> I have the following join that takes 4.5 hours (with 12 nodes) mostly
> >> >> because of a single reduce task that gets the bulk of the work:
> >> >> SELECT ...
> >> >> FROM T
> >> >> LEFT OUTER JOIN S
> >> >> ON T.timestamp = S.timestamp and T.id = S.id
> >> >> This is a 1:0/1 join so the size of the output is exactly the same as
> >> >> the
> >> >> size of T (500M records). S is actually very small (5K).
> >> >> I've tried:
> >> >> - switching the order of the join conditions
> >> >> - using a different hash function setting (jenkins instead of murmur)
> >> >> - using SET set hive.auto.convert.join = true;
> >> >
> >> > are you sure your query convert to mapjoin? if not,try use explicit
> >> > mapjoin hint.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> - using SET hive.optimize.skewjoin = true;
> >> >> but nothing helped :(
> >> >> Anything else I can try?
> >> >> Thanks!
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> Bharath .V
> >> w:http://research.iiit.ac.in/~bharath.v
> >
> >
>
> The wiki does not allow images, confluence does but we have not moved their
> yet.
>

Reply via email to