I am not sure IN clause supports executing functions in the query
did it fail when you tried less than greater than type
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:36 PM, LUTTER, Steffen <steffen.lut...@sap.com>wrote:
> Hi,****
>
> ** **
>
> I have a question regarding filters on timestamps. The syntax seems to be
> UNIX_TIMESTAMP('yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm:ss'), is there another way to express a
> datetime type? The problem is that I get an exception when using the IN
> <list> syntax, while the equal comparison works without problems.****
>
> ** **
>
> Example: SELECT * FROM table1 WHERE datecol IN (
> UNIX_TIMESTAMP('2009-01-05 00:00:00'),UNIX_TIMESTAMP('2009-01-10
> 00:00:00') )****
>
> ** **
>
> Throws exception: ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Query returned non-zero code: 10014,
> cause: FAILED: SemanticException [Error 10014]: Line 5:21 Wrong arguments
> ''2009-01-10 00:00:00'': The arguments for IN should be the same type!
> Types are: {timestamp IN (bigint, bigint)}****
>
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.jdbc.HiveStatement.executeQuery(HiveStatement.java:189)
> ****
>
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.jdbc.HiveStatement.execute(HiveStatement.java:127)*
> ***
>
> at
> com.sap.connectivity.cs.java.drivers.jdbc.JDBCAPI$Statement.execute(JDBCAPI.java:1648)
> ****
>
> at
> com.sap.connectivity.cs.java.drivers.jdbc.JDBCDriver.prepare(JDBCDriver.java:1760)
> ****
>
> ... 15 more****
>
> ** **
>
> Following query works:****
>
> ** **
>
> SELECT * FROM table1 WHERE datecol = UNIX_TIMESTAMP('2009-01-17
> 00:00:00')****
>
> ** **
>
> Is there another syntax for datetime types? Could it be a bug in the
> filter “IN <list>” operation?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks in advance,****
>
> ** **
>
> Steffen****
>
> ** **
>
--
Nitin Pawar
