This highly depends on data, optimization and queries and you have to always do some own tests. You can of course use the public hive benchmark tools, but in the end you have to fit it to your situation.
> On 24 Feb 2016, at 18:31, Mich Talebzadeh > <mich.talebza...@cloudtechnologypartners.co.uk> wrote: > > well I meant how fast it returns the results in this case compare to 1.2.1 etc > > thanks > >> On 24/02/2016 17:25, Jörn Franke wrote: >> >> I am not sure what you are looking for. Performance has many influence >> factors... >> >>> On 24 Feb 2016, at 18:23, Mich Talebzadeh >>> <mich.talebza...@cloudtechnologypartners.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> Has anyone got some performance matrix for Hive 2 from user perspective? >>> >>> It looks very impressive on ORC tables. >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> -- >>> Dr Mich Talebzadeh >>> >>> LinkedIn >>> https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw >>> >>> http://talebzadehmich.wordpress.com >>> >>> NOTE: The information in this email is proprietary and confidential. This >>> message is for the designated recipient only, if you are not the intended >>> recipient, you should destroy it immediately. Any information in this >>> message shall not be understood as given or endorsed by Cloud Technology >>> Partners Ltd, its subsidiaries or their employees, unless expressly so >>> stated. It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that this email >>> is virus free, therefore neither Cloud Technology partners Ltd, its >>> subsidiaries nor their employees accept any responsibility. >>> > > > > > -- > Dr Mich Talebzadeh > > LinkedIn > https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw > > http://talebzadehmich.wordpress.com > > NOTE: The information in this email is proprietary and confidential. This > message is for the designated recipient only, if you are not the intended > recipient, you should destroy it immediately. Any information in this message > shall not be understood as given or endorsed by Cloud Technology Partners > Ltd, its subsidiaries or their employees, unless expressly so stated. It is > the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that this email is virus free, > therefore neither Cloud Technology partners Ltd, its subsidiaries nor their > employees accept any responsibility. >
