In my test case for multiple method interceptors, I use multiple like this:
<module id="hivemind.lib.test" version="1.0.0">
<service-point id="FortuneCookie"
interface="org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.FortuneCookie">
<create-instance
class="org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.FortuneCookieImpl"/>
<interceptor service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory"
name="first">
<impl
object="instance:org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.SuffixMethodInterceptor" />
</interceptor>
<interceptor service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory"
name="second">
<impl
object="instance:org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.SuffixMethodInterceptor" />
</interceptor>
</service-point>
</module>
-----Original Message-----
From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: MethodInterceptorFactory and multiple interceptors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I have recently been using the MethodInterceptorFactory to create
interceptors based on the AOP Alliance libraries.
Now, it is all fine until I realised that I can not have two different
interceptors (using the MethodInterceptorFactory service id) added to
the same service point.
This would make sense if you for example referred to the logging
interceptor - two of it would be kinda dum. But since the
MethodInterceptorFactory is simply providing the plumbing for the real
implementation, 2 or more of this particular contribution should be fine
right?
Not sure if this is an easy problem to solve or not?
Cheers,
johan
- --
you too?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEvjIN1Tv8wj7aQ34RAp8bAJ9hbaK4PExHuKpBx6J+BhBcMj+IvwCfbUDG
HIy+uWB36gAXRWoOkv/HJBM=
=/lZk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
