ignite_mk,
ignite_mk wrote > Based on what i understand, the .NET client(windows desktop for example), > needs a JVM runtime installed? > > This may not be a good idea, in my opinion. This will cause a lot of > maintenance (think upgrades) and security concerns. > > Please advise if there is an "option" for keeping this a "pure" native > .NET implementation, without any Java runtime dependency. No, there is no such option. Such an implementation will obviously require tons of new code that has to be maintained separately, so it doesn't make much sense. Could you please describe your concerns in more details? What is wrong with the current implementation from your point of view? Also, please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that community receives email notifications. Just follow this simple instruction: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/mailing_list/MailingListOptions.jtp?forum=1 -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Native-NET-tp1689p2374.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.