Some say that 1.6 is expected by the end of the month, can't say for sure.

Obviously, I can't recommend to use unreleased code in production, but
other than that, our master branch is usually stable, so you are welcome to
try out latest features!
If you decide to do so, have a look at updated QueryExample and new
LinqExample.
It is also possible to configure everything in .NET, without Spring XML.

By the way, to avoid building from sources manually, you can use NuGet
package built from latest master on our CI server (use guest login):
http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=224958&buildTypeId=IgniteTests_IgnitePlatformNetNuGetNe&tab=artifacts

Pavel.


On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Murthy Kakarlamudi <ksa...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> That makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. Any idea what is the wait
> time for 1.6? Do you recommend building from source for 1.6 and use that
> till 1.6 is GA?
> On Apr 11, 2016 7:28 AM, "Pavel Tupitsyn" <ptupit...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>
>> In fact, keyType and valType can be arbitrary strings.
>> They are used to create SQL tables internally.
>> Look at SqlQuery constructors: some of them accept "string queryType".
>> This string must be equal to valType string in configuration.
>>
>> Using type name without namespace is just a convention. SqlQuery
>> constructor with "Type queryType" argument just passes along type name
>> string.
>>
>> This does not force the user to create unique classnames, because there
>> is a separate SQL schema for each cache in Ignite.
>> Only if you use multiple entry types in a single cache (which is not
>> recommended by itself), and these types have the same name, there will be a
>> collision.
>>
>> Sounds complicated, I know. Can't wait for 1.6 release where all of this
>> is hidden from the user :)
>>
>> Let me know if you need more details.
>>
>> Pavel.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Murthy Kakarlamudi <ksa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Pavel,
>>>     You are absolutely right. I had 2 config files and I indeed am
>>> referring to wrong version. I copied and pasted and VS and instead of
>>> creating a new file, it created a link. Thanks for helping me out.
>>>
>>> Based on your suggestion that the valueType needs to be unqualified
>>> without the namespace, the documentation needs an update. I was basically
>>> following that as an example.  But without namespace qualification, doesn't
>>> that force an user to create unique classnames?
>>>
>>> <bean class="org.apache.ignite.cache.CacheTypeMetadata">
>>>         <!-- Type to query. -->
>>>         <property name="valueType" 
>>> value="org.apache.ignite.examples.datagrid.store.Person"/>
>>>         <!-- Fields to be queried. -->
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Satya, I can run your solution without errors with fixed config.
>>>> This means that you don't actually use the config above for your nodes.
>>>> Something else gets loaded for some reason.
>>>>
>>>> Please do the following:
>>>> * Make sure that SpringConfigUrl points to the updated file everywhere
>>>> you use it.
>>>> * Replace GetOrCreateCache with GetCache. This will ensure that cache
>>>> is retrieved from config, not started dynamically.
>>>>
>>>> Pavel.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Murthy Kakarlamudi <ksa...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Pavel...Thanks for the update. I seem to be doing something wrong.
>>>>> I am still getting the same error even after applying the update you
>>>>> suggested. Not sure if the way I specified the types for the columns in
>>>>> java matched against definitions in SQL Server. I am attaching below the
>>>>> column types from SQL Server.
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>
>>>>> Below is the updated config xml
>>>>> <property name="cacheConfiguration">
>>>>>       <list>
>>>>>         <bean
>>>>> class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.CacheConfiguration">
>>>>>           <property name="name" value="BU"/>
>>>>>           <property name="writeThrough" value="true"/>
>>>>>           <property name="readThrough" value="true"/>
>>>>>           <property name="writeBehindEnabled" value="true"/>
>>>>>           <property name="writeBehindFlushFrequency" value="120000"/>
>>>>>           <property name="cacheStoreFactory">
>>>>>             <bean
>>>>> class="org.apache.ignite.platform.dotnet.PlatformDotNetCacheStoreFactory">
>>>>>               <property name="typeName"
>>>>> value="TestIgniteDAL.SQLServerStore, TestIgniteDAL"/>
>>>>>             </bean>
>>>>>           </property>
>>>>>           <property name ="typeMetadata">
>>>>>             <list>
>>>>>               <bean class="org.apache.ignite.cache.CacheTypeMetadata">
>>>>>                 <!-- Type to query. -->
>>>>>                 *<property name="valueType" value="BusinessUnit"/>*
>>>>>                 <!-- Fields to be queried. -->
>>>>>                 <property name="queryFields">
>>>>>                   <map>
>>>>>                     <entry key="BUID" value="java.lang.Long"/>
>>>>>                     <entry key="BUName" value="java.lang.String"/>
>>>>>                     <entry key="CreatedByID" value="java.lang.Long"/>
>>>>>                     <entry key="CreatedDate" value="java.util.Date"/>
>>>>>                     <entry key="ModifiedByID" value="java.lang.Long"/>
>>>>>                     <entry key="ModifiedDate" value="java.util.Date"/>
>>>>>                   </map>
>>>>>                 </property>
>>>>>                 <!-- Fields to index in ascending order. -->
>>>>>                 <property name="ascendingFields">
>>>>>                   <map>
>>>>>                     <entry key="BUID" value="java.lang.Long"/>
>>>>>                   </map>
>>>>>                 </property>
>>>>>               </bean>
>>>>>             </list>
>>>>>           </property>
>>>>>         </bean>
>>>>>       </list>
>>>>>     </property>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there a different way to specify the indexed type? In java, I can
>>>>> specify at the CacheConfiguration object leve, but .NET API had no such
>>>>> method and spring config seems to be the only way unless I am missing
>>>>> anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your help is much appreciated,
>>>>> Satya.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>>>>> ptupit...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like the problem is here:
>>>>>> <property name="valueType" value="TestIgniteDAL.BusinessUnit"/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ignite uses type name without namespace in queries and binary
>>>>>> objects, so correct line would be
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <property name="valueType" value="BusinessUnit"/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me know if this helps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pavel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Murthy Kakarlamudi <ksa...@gmail.com
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Pavel,
>>>>>>>     Below is the link to download the solution. The attached
>>>>>>> solution has 4 projects. TestIgniteServer is used to start Ignite node 
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> server mode. TestIgniteSQLClient is used to start Ignite in client mode 
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> execute the sql query against the cache.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8lM91-_3MwRYUxqX2ZHU0thRmc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks again for your help,
>>>>>>> Satya.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>>>>>>> ptupit...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Satya, there is some issue with configuration in your code. Looks
>>>>>>>> like you use different XML than provided above. Make sure the path is
>>>>>>>> correct.
>>>>>>>> Or, you can attach your entire solution, and I'll take a look.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pavel.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Murthy Kakarlamudi <
>>>>>>>> ksa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Pavel,
>>>>>>>>>    Is that the only change needed? I added that property and I am
>>>>>>>>> still getting the same error.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <property name="cacheConfiguration">
>>>>>>>>>       <list>
>>>>>>>>>         <bean
>>>>>>>>> class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.CacheConfiguration">
>>>>>>>>>           *<property name="name" value="BU"/>*
>>>>>>>>>           <property name="writeThrough" value="true"/>
>>>>>>>>>           <property name="readThrough" value="true"/>
>>>>>>>>>           <property name="writeBehindEnabled" value="true"/>
>>>>>>>>>           <property name="writeBehindFlushFrequency"
>>>>>>>>> value="120000"/>
>>>>>>>>>           <property name="cacheStoreFactory">
>>>>>>>>>             <bean
>>>>>>>>> class="org.apache.ignite.platform.dotnet.PlatformDotNetCacheStoreFactory">
>>>>>>>>>               <property name="typeName"
>>>>>>>>> value="TestIgniteDAL.SQLServerStore, TestIgniteDAL"/>
>>>>>>>>>             </bean>
>>>>>>>>>           </property>
>>>>>>>>>           <property name ="typeMetadata">
>>>>>>>>>             <list>
>>>>>>>>>               <bean
>>>>>>>>> class="org.apache.ignite.cache.CacheTypeMetadata">
>>>>>>>>>                 <!-- Type to query. -->
>>>>>>>>>                 <property name="valueType"
>>>>>>>>> value="TestIgniteDAL.BusinessUnit"/>
>>>>>>>>>                 <!-- Fields to be queried. -->
>>>>>>>>>                 <property name="queryFields">
>>>>>>>>>                   <map>
>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="BUID" value="java.lang.Long"/>
>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="BUName" value="java.lang.String"/>
>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="CreatedByID"
>>>>>>>>> value="java.lang.Long"/>
>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="CreatedDate"
>>>>>>>>> value="java.util.Date"/>
>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="ModifiedByID"
>>>>>>>>> value="java.lang.Long"/>
>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="ModifiedDate"
>>>>>>>>> value="java.util.Date"/>
>>>>>>>>>                   </map>
>>>>>>>>>                 </property>
>>>>>>>>>                 <!-- Fields to index in ascending order. -->
>>>>>>>>>                 <property name="ascendingFields">
>>>>>>>>>                   <map>
>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="BUID" value="java.lang.Long"/>
>>>>>>>>>                   </map>
>>>>>>>>>                 </property>
>>>>>>>>>               </bean>
>>>>>>>>>             </list>
>>>>>>>>>           </property>
>>>>>>>>>         </bean>
>>>>>>>>>       </list>
>>>>>>>>>     </property>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apache.Ignite.Core.Common.IgniteException was unhandled
>>>>>>>>>   HResult=-2146233088
>>>>>>>>>   Message=Indexing is disabled for cache: BU. Use setIndexedTypes
>>>>>>>>> or setTypeMetadata methods on CacheConfiguration to enable.
>>>>>>>>>   Source=Apache.Ignite.Core
>>>>>>>>>   StackTrace:
>>>>>>>>>        at
>>>>>>>>> Apache.Ignite.Core.Impl.Unmanaged.UnmanagedCallbacks.Error(Void* 
>>>>>>>>> target,
>>>>>>>>> Int32 errType, SByte* errClsChars, Int32 errClsCharsLen, SByte*
>>>>>>>>> errMsgChars, Int32 errMsgCharsLen, Void* errData, Int32 errDataLen)
>>>>>>>>>        at
>>>>>>>>> Apache.Ignite.Core.Impl.Unmanaged.IgniteJniNativeMethods.CacheOutOpQueryCursor(Void*
>>>>>>>>> ctx, Void* obj, Int32 type, Int64 memPtr)
>>>>>>>>>        at
>>>>>>>>> Apache.Ignite.Core.Impl.Unmanaged.UnmanagedUtils.CacheOutOpQueryCursor(IUnmanagedTarget
>>>>>>>>> target, Int32 type, Int64 memPtr)
>>>>>>>>>        at
>>>>>>>>> Apache.Ignite.Core.Impl.Cache.CacheImpl`2.Query(QueryBase qry)
>>>>>>>>>        at TestIgniteSQLClient.IgniteSQLClient.Main(String[] args)
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> C:\Data\Professional\dotnet\workspace\TestIgnite\TestIgniteSQLClient\IgniteSQLClient.cs:line
>>>>>>>>> 34
>>>>>>>>>   InnerException:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>>>>>>>>> ptupit...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Satya,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > Indexing is disabled for cache: BU.
>>>>>>>>>> In the XML configuration, please set cache name like this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> <bean class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.CacheConfiguration">
>>>>>>>>>>           <property name="name" value="BU"/>
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > do I have to specify the column type classes in java(ex
>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.Long etc) in the config xml even if I am working in .NET 
>>>>>>>>>> world
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, in 1.5, using Spring XML and Java types is the only way.
>>>>>>>>>> This is already fixed, and in upcoming Ignite 1.6 everything can
>>>>>>>>>> be configured right from C#.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Pavel.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Murthy Kakarlamudi <
>>>>>>>>>> ksa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>     I am running into below error trying to run SqlQuery in
>>>>>>>>>>> .NET.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache.Ignite.Core.Common.IgniteException was unhandled
>>>>>>>>>>>   HResult=-2146233088
>>>>>>>>>>>   Message=Indexing is disabled for cache: BU. Use
>>>>>>>>>>> setIndexedTypes or setTypeMetadata methods on CacheConfiguration to 
>>>>>>>>>>> enable.
>>>>>>>>>>>   Source=Apache.Ignite.Core
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am storing the entity created by Entity Framework in cache and
>>>>>>>>>>> trying to query that POCO. Below are my Ignite config xml and the 
>>>>>>>>>>> query I
>>>>>>>>>>> am using.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <property name="cacheConfiguration">
>>>>>>>>>>>       <list>
>>>>>>>>>>>         <bean
>>>>>>>>>>> class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.CacheConfiguration">
>>>>>>>>>>>           <property name="writeThrough" value="true"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>           <property name="readThrough" value="true"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>           <property name="writeBehindEnabled" value="true"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>           <property name="writeBehindFlushFrequency"
>>>>>>>>>>> value="120000"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>           <property name="cacheStoreFactory">
>>>>>>>>>>>             <bean
>>>>>>>>>>> class="org.apache.ignite.platform.dotnet.PlatformDotNetCacheStoreFactory">
>>>>>>>>>>>               <property name="typeName"
>>>>>>>>>>> value="TestIgniteDAL.SQLServerStore, TestIgniteDAL"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>             </bean>
>>>>>>>>>>>           </property>
>>>>>>>>>>>           <property name ="typeMetadata">
>>>>>>>>>>>             <list>
>>>>>>>>>>>               <bean
>>>>>>>>>>> class="org.apache.ignite.cache.CacheTypeMetadata">
>>>>>>>>>>>                 <!-- Type to query. -->
>>>>>>>>>>>                 <property name="valueType"
>>>>>>>>>>> value="TestIgniteDAL.BusinessUnit"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>                 <!-- Fields to be queried. -->
>>>>>>>>>>>                 <property name="queryFields">
>>>>>>>>>>>                   <map>
>>>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="BUID" value="java.lang.Long"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="BUName"
>>>>>>>>>>> value="java.lang.String"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="CreatedByID"
>>>>>>>>>>> value="java.lang.Long"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="CreatedDate"
>>>>>>>>>>> value="java.util.Date"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="ModifiedByID"
>>>>>>>>>>> value="java.lang.Long"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="ModifiedDate"
>>>>>>>>>>> value="java.util.Date"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>                   </map>
>>>>>>>>>>>                 </property>
>>>>>>>>>>>                 <!-- Fields to index in ascending order. -->
>>>>>>>>>>>                 <property name="ascendingFields">
>>>>>>>>>>>                   <map>
>>>>>>>>>>>                     <entry key="BUID" value="java.lang.Long"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>                   </map>
>>>>>>>>>>>                 </property>
>>>>>>>>>>>               </bean>
>>>>>>>>>>>             </list>
>>>>>>>>>>>           </property>
>>>>>>>>>>>         </bean>
>>>>>>>>>>>       </list>
>>>>>>>>>>>     </property>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>    using (var ignite = Ignition.Start(cfg))
>>>>>>>>>>>             {
>>>>>>>>>>>                 Console.WriteLine(">>> Cache query example
>>>>>>>>>>> started");
>>>>>>>>>>>                 var cache = ignite.GetCache<int,
>>>>>>>>>>> BusinessUnit>("BU");
>>>>>>>>>>>                 var qry = cache.Query(new
>>>>>>>>>>> SqlQuery(typeof(BusinessUnit),"BUID=?",5));
>>>>>>>>>>>                 foreach(var bu in qry)
>>>>>>>>>>>                 {
>>>>>>>>>>>                     Console.WriteLine(bu);
>>>>>>>>>>>                 }
>>>>>>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Also, do I have to specify the column type classes in java(ex
>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.Long etc) in the config xml even if I am working in .NET 
>>>>>>>>>>> world.
>>>>>>>>>>> Or can I use .NET equivalent classes from the POCO that was 
>>>>>>>>>>> generated from
>>>>>>>>>>> Entity Framework?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Satya.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to