Hi Val
Got it. Thanks.
On 8/29/16, 1:24 PM, "vkulichenko" <valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
Anand,
Copy constructor does not make a deep copy, so instances of SPIs is the
same. This is by design, because I'm not sure this is even possible in
general case (SPIs can be provided by users and in this case we know nothing
about them - sounds risky). I would not recommend to use copy constructor in
user code at all, but always construct a new instance instead.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__apache-2Dignite-2Dusers.70518.x6.nabble.com_SPI-2Dhas-2Dalready-2Dbeen-2Dstarted-2Dalways-2Dcreate-2Dnew-2Dconfiguration-2Dinstance-2Dfor-2Deach-2Dstarting-2DIgnite-2Dinstar-2Dtp7360p7385.html&d=DQICAg&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=qU_93SngJY3bPFd_cHFzZ8u3Owp9FHXx0iQE6zMz3jc&m=NxR9R85X95K_GPN2S2Tcp9z3UPm9snUYcHLszxZfss4&s=Kt_GyKHT_IY3dtLQMifmSsyD5uEiBCSJfaw9RM_6E0M&e=
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
