Kamil,

thanks a lot for your help. As I told before I need some time for
problem analyse. After it I'll create JIRA ticket and share link to it
in this thread.

Thank you again!

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Kamil Misuth <ki...@ethome.sk> wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> I've built ignite-3477-master (commit hash 5839f481b7) today.
> Apart from the fact that some other Configuration APIs changed,
> CacheMemoryMode disapeared. I guess this is related to
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/IGNITE-4758-introducing-cache-memory-policies-td14957.html
>
> Anyway, I've got the following exception on the first try, since
> ignite-indexing 2.0.0 is compiled against H2 1.4.191 and Spring Boot
> 1.5.2.RELEASE managed H2 version is 1.4.193 and apparently org.h2.result.Row
> changed from abstract class to an interface between the two versions.
>
> Caused by: java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: class
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.h2.opt.GridH2Row has interface
> org.h2.result.Row as super class
>
> After fixing the dependency issue, I've tried to create two node cluster and
> JVM SIGSEGVed in DirectNioClientWorker just as before.
>
> Attaching crash logs from both nodes (running on the same machine FreeBSD
> 11) to this e-mail.
>
> Kamil
>
>
> On 2017-04-12 00:49, Kamil Misuth wrote:
>>
>> Sure thing.
>>
>> I will check out ignite-3477-master as soon as I have some time tomorrow.
>>
>> Kamil
>>
>>
>> On 04/11/2017 05:48 PM, Andrey Gura wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for provided information. I need additional time for problem
>>> investigation.
>>>
>>> You can also try code from ignite-3477-master branch. This branch
>>> contains many memory related fixes but it isn't stable yet.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:37 PM, kimec.ethome.sk <ki...@ethome.sk>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Andrey,
>>>>
>>>> sorry, I've got ahead of my self.
>>>>
>>>> I am on FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p1 amd64
>>>> With OpenJDK Runtime Environment 1.8.0_121-b13 Oracle Corporation
>>>> OpenJDK
>>>> 64-Bit Server VM 25.121-b13
>>>> hw.model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4702MQ CPU @ 2.20GHz
>>>> hw.machine_arch: amd64
>>>> hw.ncpu: 8
>>>> hw.physmem: 8251813888
>>>>
>>>> Core dump is 1 GB, so I guess that is no go. I am attaching crash log to
>>>> this e-mail.
>>>> I have uploaded the project I've used during my testing here
>>>> https://github.com/kimec/ignite-spring-boot .
>>>> The sample works perfectly well with stock ignite-core on Linux OpenJDK
>>>> 8
>>>> xs64 CentOS 7 .
>>>>
>>>> Kamil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2017-04-10 12:24, Andrey Gura wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> could you please share core dump file? If not, it would be helpful to
>>>>> know what is CPU architecture on this server.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Kamil Misuth <ki...@ethome.sk> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OpenJDK (7 and 8) HotSpot JVM SIGSEGVs on FreeBSD 11 as soon as node
>>>>>> joins a
>>>>>> topology and starts to communicate via DirectNioClientWorker.
>>>>>> The root cause is DirectByteBufferStreamImpl (both versions) which
>>>>>> uses
>>>>>> GridUnsafe.getXXX/putXXX(Object object, offset, value) methods to
>>>>>> manipulate
>>>>>> DirectByteBuffer, whereas it should really be using
>>>>>> GridUnsafe.getXXX/putXXX(address, value), since DirectByteBuffer is
>>>>>> allocated on C heap (off java heap).
>>>>>> Notice that at least one instance of the same problem is known to
>>>>>> exist
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> another project using Unsafe
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8325 .
>>>>>> The OpenJDK source of Unsafe is more or less clear on this
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u60/jdk/file/935758609767/src/share/classes/sun/misc/Unsafe.java#l391
>>>>>> I have prepared a simple fix here
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/compare/1.9.0-rc2...kimec:freebsd-support
>>>>>>  .
>>>>>> However, I am not sure if the solution is right in regard to overall
>>>>>> ignite
>>>>>> performance.
>>>>>> I've tried to compile ignite-core with tests and after applying my
>>>>>> changes
>>>>>> was able to pass all the basic stuff until the performance test stage
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> which point my machine run out of RAM and swap space (some 10 GB)...
>>>>>> Not
>>>>>> sure if this is how the tests are supposed to be. After compiling with
>>>>>> -DskipTests I was able to create FreeBSD 11 - CentOS 7 two node
>>>>>> cluster
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> everything seemed OK (the two nodes shared an IGFS instance backed by
>>>>>> replicated caches).
>>>>>> Please note that OpenJDK on different systems as well as Oracle JDK
>>>>>> (via
>>>>>> Linux compatility layer) on FreeBSD seem to be more forgiving and does
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> SIGSEGV.
>>>>>> I've based my branch on 1.9.0-rc2 since tag 1.9.0 has already POM with
>>>>>> version 2.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kamil

Reply via email to