Ivan, what kind of tests did u run ? plz show SQL requests ?
1-node tests for distributed computing looks like wierd
My observations (on very simplified 1-node environment) show that
Ignite-MR ~10% faster than TEZ under equal >conditions.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Ivan V. <iveselovs...@gridgain.com>
wrote:
Hi, Alena, regarding "1) Ignite MR works slower than Hive on TEZ, but
faster than Hive on MR." -- as far as >>I remember, you have observed
incorrect results with Ignite MR, and we didn't find the reason, just
abandoned that. >>Performance measurements don't have much sense until
we have correct query results. So, I would say that there we >>just
don't have results we can trust.
Regarding ""Out of memory: Kill process" -- this means that Ignite node
process requested so much memory that OS >>failed to give. This may be
investigated further -- all the memory limits set for Ignite node
should be checked and >>compared to the real memory physically
available on the host. Do I correctly understand that Ignite MR was not
used >>in that experiment?
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Alena Melnikova <al...@74.ru> wrote:
Hi Ivan,
You're right. In kernel log there is message: "Out of memory: Kill
process
19988 (java)"
Let me sum up, please, correct me if I'm wrong.
If we use Hive + Tez we don't need Hadoop Accelerator because:
1) Ignite MR works slower than Hive on TEZ, but faster than Hive on MR.
2) TEZ+HDFS and TEZ+IGFS work at the same speed. Although TEZ+IGFS can
be
faster in queries with intensive I/O (need to test).
Many thanks for your patience and prompt help.
I'm going to try Ignite + Spark, I'll open new topic)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/HDP-Hive-Ignite-tp12195p12838.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.