Hello .. Thanks for sharing the thread..
we have 4 core, 8 GB RAM mostly Ignite is used for 2nd level cache. We have set our JVM to 1G RAM. Then, wondering how would we monitor ignite without impacting the system ? Thanks ... On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:54 PM, tysli2016 [via Apache Ignite Users] < ml+s70518n14442...@n6.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi Rishi, > > seems it's not a good idea to connect ignite repeatedly, I observed a > similar memory issue. > would you mind to share your server configurations (cores, memory)? > > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-1- > 6-0-suspected-memory-leak-from-DynamicCacheDescriptor-td9443i20.html > > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/OOME-on-2- > node-cluster-with-visor-running-repeatedly-Ignite-1-9-tt12409.html > > Tom > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/frequet- > disconnection-in-ignite-cluster-tp14411p14442.html > To start a new topic under Apache Ignite Users, email > ml+s70518n1...@n6.nabble.com > To unsubscribe from Apache Ignite Users, click here > <http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1&code=cmlzaGl5YWduaWtAZ21haWwuY29tfDF8MTMwNTI4OTg1Mw==> > . > NAML > <http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > -- Rishi Yagnik -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/frequet-disconnection-in-ignite-cluster-tp14411p14490.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
