Hi Alexey. Thanks for the feedback. It will take me a little bit to set up the test again. My original test had a bunch of machines in cluster mode, I guess to test this I can just use one with a small data region instead.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 3:59 AM, Alexey Goncharuk < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Larry, > > Recently we've fixed the ticket [1] which may cause a major performance > degradation when page replacement is present. Can you please try building > Ignite from the master branch and check if the issue is still present? > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7638 > > 2018-03-15 19:25 GMT+03:00 Larry <[email protected]>: > >> Hi Alexey. >> >> Were there any findings? Any updates would be helpful. >> >> Thanks, >> -Larry >> >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Lawernce, >>> >>> I believe Alexey Goncharuk was working on improving this scenario. >>> Alexey, can you provide some of your findings here? >>> >>> D. >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: lawrencefinn <[email protected]> >>> Date: Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:54 PM >>> Subject: Re: Large durable caches >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> BUMP. Can anyone verify this? If ignite cannot scale in this manner >>> that is >>> fine, i'd just want to know if what i am seeing makes sense. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ >>> >>> >> >
