Very much appreciated, Dmitriy! On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 2:15 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Shane, > > These flags are required to access JVM internals and are used by Ignite. > And it is not related to production readiness. > > A number of projects require these flags. In theory in some future release > Ignite can get rid of the mandatory specification of extra flags, but it > will anyway affect performance. So in this scenario (if community accept > it), Ignite will recommend to set it up but will be (much) slower without > it. > > There are a number of open discussions at dev@ related to Java 11, > modularity support. So AFAIK there are no exact plans. > > Sincerely, > Dmitriy Pavlov > > вт, 12 мар. 2019 г. в 20:48, Shane Duan <sduane...@gmail.com>: > >> Currently running Ignite 2.7 with OpenJDK11, with these additional JVM >> flags: >> >> --add-exports=java.base/jdk.internal.misc=ALL-UNNAMED >> --add-exports=java.base/sun.nio.ch=ALL-UNNAMED >> --add-exports=java.management/com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver=ALL-UNNAMED >> --add-exports=jdk.internal.jvmstat/sun.jvmstat.monitor=ALL-UNNAMED--add-exports=java.base/sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects=ALL-UNNAMED--illegal-access=permit-Djdk.tls.client.protocols=TLSv1.2 >> >> >> It is working, but also brought some concerns whether Ignite is >> production-ready... >> >> Any plan to remove these dependency on these flags in next release? >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Shane >> >> >> >> >>
