Hello!

Please take a look at
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/cache-queries#section-query-configuration-by-annotations

Regards,
-- 
Ilya Kasnacheev


вт, 19 мар. 2019 г. в 20:25, Mike Needham <needb...@gmail.com>:

> Do you have an example of how that could be done.  I am struggling to
> figure out how to set this up.
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 2:00 AM Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> The best approach is to use .setIndexedTypes() instead of
>> setQueryEntities(), and annotate complex types in question with
>> @QuerySqlField.
>> This way you can then pour those types into cache and it will work
>> transparently.
>>
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>
>>
>> пт, 15 мар. 2019 г. в 18:28, Mike Needham <needb...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Perfect, now the next question is how would you do this for a more
>>> complex object/table?  Either one defined in a separate object or via SQL
>>> DDL?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 9:05 AM Ilya Kasnacheev <
>>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> You will have to specify schema name (or cache name?) in ALLCAPS when
>>>> creating cache.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> --
>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> пт, 15 мар. 2019 г. в 16:45, Mike Needham <needb...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> I see.  did not have the "person" for the schema.  Is there a way to
>>>>> not have the quotes around that?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 7:59 AM ilya.kasnacheev <
>>>>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Definitely works for me in DBeaver with this exact code:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <
>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/file/t1312/dbeaver-tables.png>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some of DBeaver's introspection does not work but statements are
>>>>>> solid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Some days it just not worth chewing through the restraints*
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Some days it just not worth chewing through the restraints*
>>>
>>
>
> --
> *Some days it just not worth chewing through the restraints*
>

Reply via email to