Hi Evgenii, did you have a chance to look at the latest logs? On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 11:32, John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok > > stdout.copy.zip > > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ejcddp2gcml8qz2/AAD_VfUecE0hSNZX7wGbfDh3a?dl=0 > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 11:01, John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Because in between it's all the business logs. Let me make sure I didn't >> filter anything relevant. So maybe in those 13 hours nothing happened? >> >> >> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 10:53, Evgenii Zhuravlev <e.zhuravlev...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> This doesn't seem to be a full log. There is a gap for more than 13 >>> hours in the log : >>> {"appTimestamp":"2020-06-23T23:06:41.658+00:00","threadName":"ignite-update-notifier-timer","level":"WARN","loggerName":"org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cluster.GridUpdateNotifier","message":"New >>> version is available at ignite.apache.org: 2.8.1"} >>> {"appTimestamp":"2020-06-24T12:58:42.294+00:00","threadName":"disco-event-worker-#35%xxxxxx%","level":"INFO","loggerName":"org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.discovery.GridDiscoveryManager","message":"Node >>> left topology: TcpDiscoveryNode [id=02949ae0-4eea-4dc9-8aed-b3f50e8d7238, >>> addrs=[0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1%lo, 127.0.0.1, xxx.xxx.xxx.73], >>> sockAddrs=[0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1%lo:0, /127.0.0.1:0, >>> xxxxxx-task-0003/xxx.xxx.xxx.73:0], discPort=0, order=1258, intOrder=632, >>> lastExchangeTime=1592890182021, loc=false, >>> ver=2.7.0#20181130-sha1:256ae401, isClient=true]"} >>> >>> I don't see any exceptions in the log. When did the issue happen? Can >>> you share the full log? >>> >>> Evgenii >>> >>> чт, 25 июн. 2020 г. в 07:36, John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hi Evgenii, same folder shared stdout.copy >>>> >>>> Just in case: >>>> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ejcddp2gcml8qz2/AAD_VfUecE0hSNZX7wGbfDh3a?dl=0 >>>> >>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 21:23, Evgenii Zhuravlev < >>>> e.zhuravlev...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> No, it's not. It's not clear when it happened and what was with the >>>>> cluster and the client node itself at this moment. >>>>> >>>>> Evgenii >>>>> >>>>> ср, 24 июн. 2020 г. в 18:16, John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> Ok I'll try... The stack trace isn't enough? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed., Jun. 24, 2020, 4:30 p.m. Evgenii Zhuravlev, < >>>>>> e.zhuravlev...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> John, right, didn't notice them before. Can you share the full log >>>>>>> for the client node with an issue? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Evgenii >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ср, 24 июн. 2020 г. в 12:29, John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I thought I did! The link doesn't have them? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed., Jun. 24, 2020, 2:43 p.m. Evgenii Zhuravlev, < >>>>>>>> e.zhuravlev...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Can you share full log files from server nodes? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ср, 24 июн. 2020 г. в 10:47, John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The logs for server are here: >>>>>>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ejcddp2gcml8qz2/AAD_VfUecE0hSNZX7wGbfDh3a?dl=0 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The error from the client: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> javax.cache.CacheException: class >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheInvalidStateException: >>>>>>>>>> Failed to execute cache operation (all partition owners have left >>>>>>>>>> the grid, >>>>>>>>>> partition data has been lost) [cacheName=cache1, part=580, >>>>>>>>>> key=UserKeyCacheObjectImpl [part=580, val=14385045508, >>>>>>>>>> hasValBytes=false]] >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheUtils.convertToCacheException(GridCacheUtils.java:1337) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheFutureImpl.convertException(IgniteCacheFutureImpl.java:62) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.IgniteFutureImpl.get(IgniteFutureImpl.java:137) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.data.impl.IgniteCacheRepository.lambda$executeAsync$d94e711a$1(IgniteCacheRepository.java:55) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.AsyncFutureListener$1.run(AsyncFutureListener.java:53) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.data.impl.VertxIgniteExecutorAdapter.lambda$execute$0(VertxIgniteExecutorAdapter.java:18) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.vertx.core.impl.ContextImpl.executeTask(ContextImpl.java:369) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.vertx.core.impl.WorkerContext.lambda$wrapTask$0(WorkerContext.java:35) >>>>>>>>>> at io.vertx.core.impl.TaskQueue.run(TaskQueue.java:76) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30) >>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) >>>>>>>>>> Caused by: >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheInvalidStateException: >>>>>>>>>> Failed to execute cache operation (all partition owners have left >>>>>>>>>> the grid, >>>>>>>>>> partition data has been lost) [cacheName=cache1, part=580, >>>>>>>>>> key=UserKeyCacheObjectImpl [part=580, val=14385045508, >>>>>>>>>> hasValBytes=false]] >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTopologyFutureAdapter.validatePartitionOperation(GridDhtTopologyFutureAdapter.java:169) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTopologyFutureAdapter.validateCache(GridDhtTopologyFutureAdapter.java:116) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridPartitionedSingleGetFuture.init(GridPartitionedSingleGetFuture.java:208) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.atomic.GridDhtAtomicCache.getAsync0(GridDhtAtomicCache.java:1428) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.atomic.GridDhtAtomicCache.access$1600(GridDhtAtomicCache.java:135) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.atomic.GridDhtAtomicCache$16.apply(GridDhtAtomicCache.java:474) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.atomic.GridDhtAtomicCache$16.apply(GridDhtAtomicCache.java:472) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.atomic.GridDhtAtomicCache.asyncOp(GridDhtAtomicCache.java:761) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.atomic.GridDhtAtomicCache.getAsync(GridDhtAtomicCache.java:472) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAdapter.getAsync(GridCacheAdapter.java:4749) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAdapter.getAsync(GridCacheAdapter.java:1477) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheProxyImpl.getAsync(IgniteCacheProxyImpl.java:937) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GatewayProtectedCacheProxy.getAsync(GatewayProtectedCacheProxy.java:652) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.data.impl.IgniteCacheRepository.lambda$get$1(IgniteCacheRepository.java:28) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.data.impl.IgniteCacheRepository.executeAsync(IgniteCacheRepository.java:51) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.data.impl.IgniteCacheRepository.get(IgniteCacheRepository.java:28) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.impl.CarrierCodeServiceImpl.getCarrierIdOfPhone(CarrierCodeServiceImpl.java:65) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.impl.SmppGatewayServiceImpl.sendSms(SmppGatewayServiceImpl.java:39) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.impl.MtEventProcessor.process(MtEventProcessor.java:46) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.kafka.impl.KafkaProcessorImpl.lambda$null$4(KafkaProcessorImpl.java:83) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableCreate.subscribeActual(CompletableCreate.java:39) >>>>>>>>>> at io.reactivex.Completable.subscribe(Completable.java:2309) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableTimeout.subscribeActual(CompletableTimeout.java:53) >>>>>>>>>> at io.reactivex.Completable.subscribe(Completable.java:2309) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletablePeek.subscribeActual(CompletablePeek.java:51) >>>>>>>>>> at io.reactivex.Completable.subscribe(Completable.java:2309) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableResumeNext.subscribeActual(CompletableResumeNext.java:41) >>>>>>>>>> at io.reactivex.Completable.subscribe(Completable.java:2309) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableToFlowable.subscribeActual(CompletableToFlowable.java:32) >>>>>>>>>> at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14918) >>>>>>>>>> at io.reactivex.Flowable.subscribe(Flowable.java:14865) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFlatMap$MergeSubscriber.onNext(FlowableFlatMap.java:163) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFromIterable$IteratorSubscription.slowPath(FlowableFromIterable.java:236) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFromIterable$BaseRangeSubscription.request(FlowableFromIterable.java:124) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFlatMap$MergeSubscriber.drainLoop(FlowableFlatMap.java:546) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFlatMap$MergeSubscriber.drain(FlowableFlatMap.java:366) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.flowable.FlowableFlatMap$InnerSubscriber.onComplete(FlowableFlatMap.java:678) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.observers.SubscriberCompletableObserver.onComplete(SubscriberCompletableObserver.java:33) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableResumeNext$ResumeNextObserver.onComplete(CompletableResumeNext.java:68) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletablePeek$CompletableObserverImplementation.onComplete(CompletablePeek.java:115) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableTimeout$TimeOutObserver.onComplete(CompletableTimeout.java:87) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.reactivex.internal.operators.completable.CompletableCreate$Emitter.onComplete(CompletableCreate.java:64) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.common.vertx.ext.kafka.impl.KafkaProcessorImpl.lambda$null$3(KafkaProcessorImpl.java:86) >>>>>>>>>> at io.vertx.core.impl.FutureImpl.dispatch(FutureImpl.java:105) >>>>>>>>>> at io.vertx.core.impl.FutureImpl.tryComplete(FutureImpl.java:150) >>>>>>>>>> at io.vertx.core.impl.FutureImpl.tryComplete(FutureImpl.java:157) >>>>>>>>>> at io.vertx.core.impl.FutureImpl.complete(FutureImpl.java:118) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> com.xxxxxx.impl.MtEventProcessor.lambda$process$0(MtEventProcessor.java:83) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.handleDispatchResponse(HttpContext.java:310) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.execute(HttpContext.java:297) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.next(HttpContext.java:272) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.predicate.PredicateInterceptor.handle(PredicateInterceptor.java:69) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.predicate.PredicateInterceptor.handle(PredicateInterceptor.java:32) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.next(HttpContext.java:269) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.fire(HttpContext.java:279) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.dispatchResponse(HttpContext.java:240) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> io.vertx.ext.web.client.impl.HttpContext.lambda$null$2(HttpContext.java:370) >>>>>>>>>> ... 7 common frames omitted >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 13:28, John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Not sure about the wrong configuration... All the apps work this >>>>>>>>>>> seems to happen every few weeks. We don't have any particular heavy >>>>>>>>>>> load. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I just bounced the client application and the errors went away. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 12:57, Evgenii Zhuravlev < >>>>>>>>>>> e.zhuravlev...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It means that there are no nodes in the cluster that holds >>>>>>>>>>>> certain partitions. So, probably you have a wrong configuration or >>>>>>>>>>>> some of >>>>>>>>>>>> the nodes left the cluster and you don't have backups in the >>>>>>>>>>>> cluster for >>>>>>>>>>>> these partitions. I believe more can be found from logs. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Evgenii >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 24 июн. 2020 г. в 09:52, John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also I'm assuming that the thin client wouldn't be susceptible >>>>>>>>>>>>> to this error? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 12:38, John Smith < >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.dev....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The cluster is showing active when running control.sh >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But the client is showing "all partition owners have left >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the grid" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The client node is marked as client=true so it's not a server >>>>>>>>>>>>>> node. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this split brain as well? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
