Devin, Please consider watching this talk by Ivan Rakov, one of main contributors to the native persistence. Rewind to 28 minutes 14 seconds for performance consideration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2ArcJPH4iU
Let us know if any piece of advice was helpful and we’ll put the knowledge on paper then for better discoverability. Denis On Thursday, August 6, 2020, Evgenii Zhuravlev <e.zhuravlev...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Devin, > > Yes, you're right, the first step could be increasing the amount of > offheap memory used for data(data region size). By default, Ignite uses 20% > of available RAM. > > After that, I would recommend finding where the bottleneck is for your > system - you can check CPU, disk and network to find it. > > Best Regards, > Evgenii > > чт, 6 авг. 2020 г. в 12:49, Devin Bost <devin.b...@gmail.com>: > >> While looking at the docs, there are a lot of available parameters for >> performance tuning. >> We have several high-velocity Ignite operations, and Ignite is having >> trouble keeping up. We are using native persistence, and I suspect we will >> get more value from increasing the amount of memory used since I think the >> default memory utilization is low if I remember correctly. >> >> We're wondering what the first few things should be for us to look at for >> performance tuning and wondering if anyone has some guidance so we know >> what to start with. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Devin G. Bost >> > -- - Denis
