Hello!

This does indeed look like a bug. I have filed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14161

Regards,
-- 
Ilya Kasnacheev


ср, 10 февр. 2021 г. в 15:48, <[email protected]>:

> Hi Ilya,
>
> Sure, the complete code could be found here:
> https://github.com/ifedorenkov-tda/ignite-experiments/tree/continuous-query-with-transformer-missing-events
> Just start 3-4 server nodes and then 1 client node.
>
> Best regards,
> Ivan Fedorenkov
>
> From: Ilya Kasnacheev <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 12:55 PM
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: ContinuousQueryWithTransformer fails to deliver an update
> when a custom java class is being used as a transformed value
>
> Hello!
>
> Can you please share the complete runnable project? In your gist, POJO
> classes are missing.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> вт, 9 февр. 2021 г. в 13:57, <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>>:
> Dear Igniters,
>
> I have come across a bug in ContinuousQueryWithTransformer. The thing is
> that the query is failing to deliver some updates when a custom java class
> is being used as a transformed value. On attempt to serialize the custom
> type Ignite marshaller throws an exception, stated that the class hasn’t
> been registered yet. Sometimes it takes like 3-4 attempts for a marshaller
> to serialize the required object.
> It would’ve been kind of ok if the event would be eventually delivered,
> however that is not the case.
>
> The code that I am using to reproduce the issue:
> https://gist.github.com/ifedorenkov-tda/069b33edcd4fdb0afd68862c1b46563f<
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gist.github.com/ifedorenkov-tda/069b33edcd4fdb0afd68862c1b46563f__;!!PNmPxbqrAcYR!2CsruMvfwmxLzj1Q56eBNRhEskcShguDsA2lkrSlDMJBWIiN_0chTDxcvIXXE50dhRk0gwIpag$
> >
> The output:
>
> Put account: Person#1
> Put account: Person#2
> Caught updated account: Person#1
> Caught updated account: Person#2
> Put account: Person#3
> Caught updated account: Person#3
> Put account: Person#4
> Caught updated account: Person#4
> Put account: Person#5
> Caught updated account: Person#5
> Put account: Person#6
> Caught updated account: Person#6
> Put account: Person#7
> Caught updated account: Person#7
> Put account: Person#8
> Put account: Person#9
> Caught updated account: Person#9
> Put account: Person#10
> Caught updated account: Person#10
> Put account: Person#11
> Caught updated account: Person#11
> Put account: Person#12
> …
>
> As you can see the update for Person#8 has been missed.
>
> Workaround: use Externalizable type, so that Ignite won’t fail to
> serialize the object from the very beginning
>
> Best regards,
> Ivan Fedorenkov
>

Reply via email to