Hello Stephen, the document(ReadMe) you shared earlier, has mentioned that
ignite-calcite must be declared as a dependency.
In this case, it would be, org.apache.ignite:ignite-calcite:2.13.0 right!.
But, which, at the moment, is not available.
Can you please advise?

On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 5:21 PM Zhenya Stanilovsky <arzamas...@mail.ru>
wrote:

> Seems it would be published with new documentation, Nikita Amelchev isn`t
> it ? check [1]
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15189
>
>
> Thank you Stephen.
> Is there also a writeup summarizing what is/isn't supported with this
> 'experimental' feature?
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 4:30 PM Stephen Darlington <
> stephen.darling...@gridgain.com
> <//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3astephen.darling...@gridgain.com>>
> wrote:
>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/2.13.0/modules/calcite/README.txt
>
>
> On 28 Apr 2022, at 11:46, Lokesh Bandaru <lokeshband...@gmail.com
> <//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3alokeshband...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Ilya.
>
> Version 2.13 has come out but still seems to be shipping with the same
> vulnerability-ridden version of h2 database.
> The documentation doesn't mention if/how Calcite is turned on.
> Can you advise on how it can be enabled?
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 7:29 AM Ilya Korol <llivezk...@gmail.com
> <//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3allivezk...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Lokesh,
>
> Updates for running Ignite over Java 17 is already in master. Please
> take a look:
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/bin/include/jvmdefaults.sh
>
> On 2022/04/12 10:11:57 Lokesh Bandaru wrote:
>  > You are fast. :) Was just typing a reply on top of the last one and
> yours
>  > is already here.
>  >
>  > Ignore the last question, found this,
>  > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.13 .
>  > *Looking forward to this release. *
>  >
>  > *One slightly unrelated question, feel free to ignore. *
>  > *I know there is no support(or certified) for any version of Java
> greater
>  > than 11. *
>  > *What would it take for 2.13 to be able to run on Java17?*
>  >
>  > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 3:36 PM Stephen Darlington <
>  > stephen.darling...@gridgain.com
> <//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3astephen.darling...@gridgain.com>>
> wrote:
>  >
>  > > Code freeze was yesterday. The target release date is 22 April.
>  > >
>  > > More here: Apache+Ignite+2.13
>  > > <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.13>
>  > >
>  > > On 12 Apr 2022, at 11:03, Lokesh Bandaru <lo...@gmail.com
> <//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3alo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > Thanks for getting back, Stephen.
>  > > I am aware that Calcite is in the plans.
>  > > Any tentative timeline as to when 2.13(beta/ga) is going to be made
>  > > available?
>  > >
>  > > Regards.
>  > >
>  > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 2:15 PM Stephen Darlington <
>  > > stephen.darling...@gridgain.com
> <//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3astephen.darling...@gridgain.com>>
> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >> The H2 project removed support for Ignite some time ago (
>  > >> https://github.com/h2database/h2database/pull/2227) which makes it
>  > >> difficult to move to newer versions.
>  > >>
>  > >> The next version of Ignite (2.13) has an alternative SQL engine
> (Apache
>  > >> Calcite) so over time there will be no need for H2.
>  > >>
>  > >> On 11 Apr 2022, at 20:34, Lokesh Bandaru <lo...@gmail.com
> <//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3alo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>  > >>
>  > >> Resending.
>  > >>
>  > >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 6:42 PM Lokesh Bandaru <lo...@gmail.com
> <//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3alo...@gmail.com>>
>  > >> wrote:
>  > >>
>  > >>> Hello there, hi
>  > >>>
>  > >>> Writing to you with regards to the security
> vulnerabilities(particularly
>  > >>> the most recent ones, CVE-2022-xxx and CVE-2021-xxx) in the H2
> database and
>  > >>> the Apache Ignite's dependency on the flagged versions of H2.
>  > >>> There is an open issue tracking this,
>  > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16542, which doesn't
> seem
>  > >>> to have been fully addressed yet.
>  > >>> Have these problems been overcome already? Can you please advise?
>  > >>>
>  > >>> Thanks.
>  > >>>
>  > >>
>  > >>
>  > >
>  >
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to