Also, please use pyignite 0.6.0 if possible. пн, 26 дек. 2022 г. в 18:58, Ivan Daschinsky <[email protected]>:
> I perfectly understand that the API is awful, but there is no way to > change it without breaking backward compatibility. > > It is impossible to make classes with the metaclass GeneralObjectMeta > hashable. Firstly, these classes are mutable. > Secondly, their hashcode can be calculated properly only with meta > registry and possibly with network requests. > > Possible solution is to return not a dictionary, but a list of kv tuples. > But it will also break backward compatibility. > I don't understand why this variant was not chosen. > > пн, 26 дек. 2022 г. в 18:52, Ivan Daschinsky <[email protected]>: > >> Nope, unfotunately there is not any built in method. But it seems that >> this is not necessary at all to do this? >> >> def wrap_binary(client, value) : >> with BinaryStream(client) as stream: >> BinaryObject.from_python(stream, value) >> return (stream.getvalue(), 0) >> >> for k in data.keys(): >> key = client.unwrap_binary(k) >> >> print(key) >> print(data[wrap_binary(client, key)]) >> >> > > -- > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy > -- Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
