Hi,
Thank you all.
metric works for me to find cache count. could you please let me know if
any option for getting all caches with count in single window or
tabular format

Thanks & Regards,
Charlin


On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 at 14:59, Stephen Darlington <sdarling...@apache.org>
wrote:

> bin/control.sh --metric cache.SQL_PUBLIC_IGNITE
>
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 at 10:06, Charlin S <charli...@hotelhub.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> ./control.sh —system-view CACHES also not having cache records count.
>> How to get cache count like visorcommand
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Charlin
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 22:21, Николай Ижиков <nizhi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> > Thanks for your email, able to get a list of caches like list . but
>>> the result format is not easy to understand.<image.png
>>>
>>> System view command outputs table rows with the single line.
>>> You can adjust formatting with the following:
>>>
>>> ./control.sh —system-view CACHES > output.txt
>>>
>>> Then view output.txt with the any editor, disable wrap lines option.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > 15 апр. 2024 г., в 19:25, Stephen Darlington <sdarling...@apache.org>
>>> написал(а):
>>> >
>>> > What tool are you using?
>>> >
>>> > If you're using sqlline, you could do "!set output vertical" or only
>>> select the columns you're interested in.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 17:09, Charlin S <charli...@hotelhub.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hello Nizhikov,
>>> > Thanks for your email, able to get a list of caches like list . but
>>> the result format is not easy to understand.<image.png>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks & Regards,
>>> > Charlin
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 19:39, Николай Ижиков <nizhi...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hello, Charlin
>>> >
>>> > Looks like system view CACHES can help you.
>>> >
>>> https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/monitoring-metrics/system-views#caches
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > 15 апр. 2024 г., в 09:30, Charlin S <charli...@hotelhub.com>
>>> написал(а):
>>> > >
>>> > > Hi All,
>>> > > Thank you for your email.
>>> > > Still I am missing cache -scan result details like below (in
>>> visorcmd).
>>> > > <image.png>
>>> > >  Is it possible to get results using   --cache scan list .   ?
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks & Regards,
>>> > > Charlin
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 18:46, Николай Ижиков <nizhi...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > Hello, Charlin
>>> > >
>>> > > Please, take a look at system views:
>>> > >
>>> > > NODES, BASELINE_NODES.
>>> > >
>>> > > You can query them by control.sh -
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/tools/control-script#system-view-command
>>> > >
>>> > > control.sh --system-view nodes
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > 12 апр. 2024 г., в 15:38, Charlin S <charli...@hotelhub.com>
>>> написал(а):
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Hi Pavel,
>>> > > > Thank you for your email. --baseline argument not showing client
>>> node list, actually 1 server and 1 client node should shown
>>> > > >
>>> > > > <image.png>
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks & Regards,
>>> > > > Charlin
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 18:40, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > > control.sh is the replacement:
>>> > > > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/tools/control-script
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 3:56 PM Rajiv Shah <
>>> rajiv.s...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>>> > > > Hi Charlin,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I am working as a Principal Architect at GridGain.
>>> > > > Let me know if you would like to have a call to discuss your
>>> project and needs, so I can figure out how to help you.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Regards,
>>> > > > Rajiv Shah
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 8:01 AM Charlin S <charli...@hotelhub.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > > Hi All,
>>> > > > Currently I am using Ignite 2.10 and planning to upgrade Ignite
>>> 2.16 and found that
>>> > > > ignitevisorcmd  tool had been removed from Ignite 2.15 onwards.
>>> What is the alternative way for checking grids statistics and cache details
>>> without ignitevisorcmd tool.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks & Regards,
>>> > > > Charlin
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to