Sorry, I meant "service deployment does work with peer deployment"

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015, 08:21 Thiago Souza <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Well, it seems that peer deployment does work with peer class loading. The
> problem I described is with method invocation with arguments that includes
> classes from the service classpath.
>
> Regards
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015, 08:04 yakov [via Apache Ignite Users] <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Correct link is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-975
>>
>> --Yakov
>>
>> 2015-06-02 13:03 GMT+03:00 Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]
>> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=440&i=0>>:
>>
>>> Hi! I reproduced the issue and filed a ticket:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-976
>>>
>>> In the meantime, turn off peer-loading and make all classes available on
>>> all nodes. This configuration is much better from performance standpoint
>>> and is recommended in production.
>>>
>>> I am also cross-posting this thread to dev list in order to raise a
>>> question - should services support peer-deployment? My answer is no.
>>> Service may be implemented in the way that missing classes may be required
>>> after master node leaves, but service may be configured to stay after
>>> master leaves. So, even CONTINUOUS deployment mode does not help.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --Yakov
>>>
>>> 2015-06-02 2:36 GMT+03:00 tcostasouza <[hidden email]
>>> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=440&i=1>>:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> It seems that, even with peer class loading enabled, Ignite is
>>>> searching for
>>>> a Service's method argument classes from it's root classpath. Consider
>>>> de
>>>> following example:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now, start 2 Ignite nodes with peer class loading enabled. From one
>>>> node,
>>>> deploy and invoke service:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Invocation will fail with Ignite complaining that it couldn't find
>>>> TestServiceImpl class in sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader (full log
>>>> here
>>>> <
>>>> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/file/n437/ignite_exception.log
>>>> >
>>>> )
>>>>
>>>> Now, if I change from TestService.execute(TestRequest) to something like
>>>> TestService.execute(int), then it works as expected.
>>>>
>>>> Any clue?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Failed-to-unmarshal-service-method-arguments-tp437.html
>>>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
>> below:
>>
>> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Failed-to-unmarshal-service-method-arguments-tp437p440.html
>>  To unsubscribe from Failed to unmarshal service method arguments, click
>> here
>> <http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=437&code=dGNvc3Rhc291emFAZ21haWwuY29tfDQzN3wtMTI3MjQ2NDcyNQ==>
>> .
>> NAML
>> <http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>>
>




--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Failed-to-unmarshal-service-method-arguments-tp437p442.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to