Paulo Sérgio Medeiros escreveu:
Hi Cristiano,

Yeah, just after sending the message I was thinking about alternatives such as organizing the project in a way that I could use the exclude and include the ones I want to be executed. I'll try this way. It will probably do the job. If there are any impediments in this regard we talk again.
yep, I think it will resolve your case...

By the way, I noticed that many of the people names of this list seems to be Portuguese/Brazilian. Are the jbehave developers from Portugal/ Brazil? :-)
:-) I'm brazilian... but there are people helping and contributing from other countries too (Italy, EUA, England, etc)... Open source + internet = it's a such cool thing 8-)

cheers.
bye
Cristiano Gavião

On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Cristiano Gavião <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    hummm...  this will depend a little on which mode you choosed to
    run your tests. take a look here:
    http://jbehave.org/reference/stable/running-stories.html

    but won't be easier to put the stories that you won't to get
    executed (the internal ones) on a diferent folders from the ones
    that you wanted to (the main ones)?

    doing this, I think it's easy to include or exclude the stories
    that you want or not... in any mode...

    cheers

    Cristiano

    Paulo Sérgio Medeiros escreveu:

        Hello,

        I'm thinking in implementing a way, if it already does not
        exist, to define what stories will run in a test trial.
        In my case, I want to define that when a story is a dependency
        (specified in a GivenStories) of another it should not be
        executed "alone" (but just when it is called in the
        GivenStories statement)

        As far as I could understand (I haven't dug very deep in this
        issue) the most effective way to do this is to implement
        StoryPathResolver or maybe extend StoryRunner.

        So, before I begin implementing this I was wishing to know
        first if this functionality is already implemented in jbehave
        or, if it's not, what is the best way to implement this.

        Thanks in advance,
        Paulo Sergio.





    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

      http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to