-------- Original Message --------
From: - Sat Oct 5 11:13:27 2013
X-Account-Key: account3
X-UIDL: 1380996756.20195_0.b.spam,S=3620
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
a.spam.sonic.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DCC_REPUT_00_12,
MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from g.mx.sonic.net (g.mx.sonic.net [69.12.221.236]) by
b.spam.sonic.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r95ICZVZ020185 for
<[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 11:12:35 -0700
Received: from mail.codehaus.org (mail.codehaus.org [199.193.192.103])
by g.mx.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id
r95ICVI0006252 for <[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 11:12:35 -0700
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Received: (qmail 26969 invoked for bounce); 5 Oct 2013 18:12:30 -0000
Date: 5 Oct 2013 18:12:30 -0000
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: failure notice
X-Sonic-SB-IP-RBLs: IP RBLs .
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.codehaus.org.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[email protected]>:
Sorry, only subscribers may post. If you are a subscriber, please forward this
message to [email protected] to get your new address included.
(#5.7.2)
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: (qmail 26963 invoked by uid 89); 5 Oct 2013 18:12:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO b.mail.sonic.net) (64.142.19.5)
by 63-246-24-167.contegix.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 5 Oct
2013 18:12:30 -0000
Received-SPF: none (63-246-24-167.contegix.com: domain at kendallshaw.com does
not designate permitted sender hosts)
Received: from nekobasu.localdomain (c-67-161-38-155.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
[67.161.38.155])
(authenticated bits=0)
by b.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id
r95ICSrD011834
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 11:12:29 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 11:12:28 -0700
From: Kendall Shaw <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311
Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [email protected]
Subject: jbehave-web master build weirdness
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
I'm sort of using master by accident. But, to get it to build and have
tests succeed I changed:
PropertyWebDriverProvider.createDriver so that the case statement has
default: at the end and defaults to firefox.
PropertyWebDriverProviderTest.shouldSupportFirefoxByDefault to save and
then clear the browser property before running the test (it was set to
htmlunit somehow). I then restore the property if it is not null
That is not the end of the story, but I stopped after it completed
successfully.
After failure, and running mvn install -rf :jbehave-web-selenium, the
browser property was set to "htmlunit". After the fixes I mention above
(except for checking if the property was null), apparently the browser
property was unset. I can't make sense of that. But, I think it means
that the browser property is different if you run the entire suite vs.
the selenium test. Maybe an unintentional dependency,
My employer has rights to my brain so I cannot provide a diff... sorry.
Kendall
--
ThisIsHardToRead, asIsThis. This_is_easier, unless_it_is_underlined.
This.is.easy. This-is-easy-too. Almost as easy to read as this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
