On 10/12/05, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry about that :)
Probably i found the "problem". On every projects (activemq, jenks, servicemix...) you order the release announcement in an ascending fashion so 1.0 get listed on top of 1.1 I think i look at them as with the news where the latest is on top of the oldest one. Definitely not a big problem, just wish to show you why :) > Definitely! We're always grateful for any contributions. I will. > Sounds cool :) I've wondered for ActiveMQ and ServiceMix, it might > be nice to use a high performance replicated LDAP as a way of > discovering servers and managing and configuring them. Never thought about ServiceMIX (reading through the docs right now and already seems very attractive), my currently implementation is based on a distributed network of local embedded activemq brokers connected with each other with Jenks underneath to do JCA and transaction management (both for sending and consuming messages) -- Massimo
